source: trunk/ICRC_01/mccontrib.tex@ 798

Last change on this file since 798 was 798, checked in by harald, 24 years ago
The version of 17.5.2001. Introduction in the first draft.
File size: 9.8 KB
Line 
1
2\documentclass{icrc}
3
4\usepackage{times}
5\usepackage{graphicx} % when using Latex and dvips
6% % (the latter best with option -Pcmz, if available,
7% % to invoke Type 1 cm fonts)
8%\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx} % when using pdfLatex (preferred)
9
10\begin{document}
11
12\title{Title}
13\author[1]{O. Blanch}
14\affil[1]{IFAE, Barcelona, Spain}
15\author[2]{J.C. Gonzalez}
16\affil[2]{Universidad Complutense Madrid, Spain}
17\author[3]{H. Kornmayer}
18\affil[3]{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, M\"unchen, Germany}
19\correspondence{H. Kornmayer (h.kornmayer@web.de)}
20
21\firstpage{1}
22\pubyear{2001}
23
24% \titleheight{11cm} % uncomment and adjust in case your title block
25 % does not fit into the default and minimum 7.5 cm
26
27\maketitle
28
29\begin{abstract}
30For the understanding of a large Cherenkov telescope a detailed
31simulation of air showers and of the detector response are
32unavoidable. Such a simulation must take into account the development
33of air showers in the atmosphere, the reflectivity of the mirrors,
34the response of photo detectors
35and the influence of both the light of night sky and the light of
36bright stars.
37A detailed study will be presented.
38\end{abstract}
39
40\section{Introduction}
41
42In this year the construction of the the $17~\mathrm{m}$ diameter
43Che\-ren\-kov telescope called MAGIC will be finished. The aim of this
44detector is the observation of $\gamma$-ray sources in the
45enery region above $\approx 10~\mathrm{TeV}$.
46The size of the telesope mirros will be around $250~\mathrm{m^2}$.
47The air showers induced by cosmic ray particles (hadrons and gammas)
48will be detected with a "classical" camera consisting of 577
49photomultiplier tubes (PMT). The analog signals of these PMTs will
50be recorded by a FADC system running with a frequency of
51$f = 333~\mathrm{MHz}$.
52The readout of the FADCs by a dedicated trigger system containing
53different trigger levels.
54
55The goal of the trigger system is to reject the hadronic cosmic ray
56background from the gamma rays, for which a lower threshold is aimed.
57For a better understanding of the MAGIC telescope and its different
58systems (trigger, FADC) a detailed Monte Carlo (MC) study is
59unavoidable. Such an study has to take into account the simulation
60of air showers, the effect of absorption in the atmosphere, the
61behaviour of the PMTs and the response of the trigger and FADC
62system.
63For a big telescope like MAGIC there is an additional source of
64noise, which is the light of the night sky. As a rude assumption
65there will be around 50 stars with magnitude $m \le 9$ in the
66field of view of the camera. So one other game of this
67study is to invent methods to become rid of the light from
68stars.
69
70Here we present the first results of such an investigation.
71
72\section{Generation of MC data samples}
73
74The simulation of the MAGIC telescope is seperated in a
75subsequent chain of smaller simulation parts. First the
76air showers are simulated with the
77CORSIKA program \citep{hk95}.
78In the next step we simulate the reflection of the
79Cherenkov photons on the mirror dish.
80Then the behaviour of the PMTs is simulated and the
81response of the trigger and FADC system is generated.
82In the followin subsections you find a more precise
83description of all the programs.
84
85\subsection{Air shower simulation}
86
87The simulation of gammas and of hadrons is done with
88the CORSIKA program, version ????.
89For the simulation of hadronic
90showers we use the VENUS model. We simulate showers
91for different zenith angles
92($\Theta = 0^\circ, 5^\circ, 10^\circ, 15^\circ,
9320^\circ, 25^\circ $).
94Gammas where simulated like a point source
95whereas the hadrons are simulated isotropic around
96the given zenith angle. We found that hadronic showers
97have also for big impact parameters $I$ a non-zero
98probability to trigger the telescope. Therefore we
99simulate hadrons with $I < 400~\mathrm{m}$ and gammas
100with $I < 200~\mathrm{m}$.
101The number of generated showers can be found in table
102\ref{tab_showers}.
103%
104%
105%
106\begin{table}[b]
107\begin{center}
108 \begin{tabular}{|c||r|r||}
109 \hline
110 zenith angle & gammas & protons \\
111 \hline \hline
112 $\Theta = 0^\circ$ & & \\
113 $\Theta = 5^\circ$ & & \\
114 $\Theta = 10^\circ$ & & \\
115 $\Theta = 15^\circ$ & & $\approx 5 \cdot 10^6$ \\
116 $\Theta = 20^\circ$ & & \\
117 $\Theta = 25^\circ$ & & \\
118 \hline
119 \end{tabular}
120\end{center}
121\caption {Number of generated showers}
122\label{tab_showers}
123\end{table}
124%
125%
126%
127For each simulated shower all
128Cherenkov photons hitting the groud at observation level
129close to the telesope position are stored.
130
131\subsection{mirror simulation}
132
133The output of the air shower simualition is used
134as the input to the mirror simulation. But before
135simulating the mirror themself, one has to take the
136absorption in the atmosphere into account. For each
137Cherenkov photon the height of production and
138the wavelength is known. Taking the Rayleigh and
139Mie scattering into account one is able to calculate
140the effect of absorption in the atmosphere.
141The next step in the simulation is the reflection of
142the Cherenkov photons on the mirrors. Therefore one
143has to define in that step the pointing of the
144telescope. Each photon hitting one of the mirrors will
145be tracked to the camera plane. Here we take an
146reflectivity of around 90\% into account.
147All Cherenkov photons reaching the camera plane will be
148stored.
149
150\subsection{camera simulation}
151
152The camera simulates the behaviour of the PMTs and the
153electronics of the trigger and FADC system. After the
154pixelisation we take the wavelength dependent quantum
155efficiency (QE) for each PMT into account.
156In figure \ref{fig_qe}
157the QE of a typical MAGIC PMT is shown.
158%
159%
160%
161\begin{figure}[hb]
162 \vspace*{2.0mm} % just in case for shifting the figure slightly down
163 \includegraphics[width=8.3cm]{qe_123.eps} % .eps for Latex,
164 % pdfLatex allows .pdf, .jpg, .png and .tif
165 \caption{quantum efficency of the PMT for pixel 123}
166 \label{fig_qe}
167\end{figure}
168%
169%
170%
171For each photo electron (PE) leaving the photo cathod we
172generate a "standard" response function that we add to
173the analog signal of that PMT - seperatly for the
174trigger and the FADC system.
175At the present these response function are gaussians with
176a given width.
177The amplitude of the response function is randomized
178by using the function of figure \ref{fig_ampl}.
179By superimpose all photons of one pixel an by taking
180the arrival time into account we get the response
181of the trigger and FADC system for that pixel (see
182also figure \ref{fig_starresp}).
183This is done for all pixels in the camera.
184
185Then the simulation of the trigger electronic is applied.
186We look in the generated analog signal if the discriminator
187threshold is achieved. If yes we will create a digital output
188signal for that pixels. Then we decided if a first level trigger
189occurs by looking for next neighbour (NN)conditions at a given
190time. If a given NN condition (Multiplicity, Topology, ...)
191is fullfilled, a first level trigger is generated and the
192content of the FADC system is written to disk. An triggered
193event is generated.
194%
195%
196%
197\begin{figure}[t]
198 \vspace*{2.0mm} % just in case for shifting the figure slightly down
199 \includegraphics[width=8.3cm]{ampldist.eps} % .eps for Latex,
200 % pdfLatex allows .pdf, .jpg, .png and .tif
201 \caption{The distibution of amplitude of the standard response function.}
202 \label{fig_ampl}
203\end{figure}
204%
205%
206%
207
208\subsection{starlight simulation}
209
210Due to the big mirror surface the light from the stars around
211the position of an expected gamma ray source is contributing to
212the noise in the camera. We developed a program that allows use
213to simulate the star light together with the generated shower.
214This program takes all stars in the field of view of the camera
215around chosen sky region. The light of these stars is track up to
216the camera taking the frequency of the light into account.
217After simulating the response of the photo cathode, we
218get the number of emitted photo electrons per pixel and
219time.
220These number is used to generate a noise signal for all the pixels.
221In figure \ref{fig_starresp} the response of the trigger and the
222FADC system can be seen for one pixel with a star of
223magnitude $m = 7$.
224These stars are typical, because there will
225be always one $7^m$ star in the trigger area of the camera.
226%
227%
228%
229\begin{figure}[h]
230 \vspace*{2.0mm} % just in case for shifting the figure slightly down
231 \includegraphics[width=8.3cm]{signal.eps} % .eps for Latex,
232 % pdfLatex allows .pdf, .jpg, .png and .tif
233 \caption{The response of a pixel due to a star with magnitude
234 $m=7$ in the field of view. On the left plot the response of the
235 trigger system is plotted while on the right plot the content in the
236 FADC system is shown.}
237 \label{fig_starresp}
238\end{figure}
239%
240%
241%
242
243
244
245\section{Results}
246
247\subsection{Trigger studies}
248
249\subsubsection{Collection area}
250
251\subsubsection{Threshold of MAGIC telescope}
252
253\subsubsection{Expected rates}
254
255\section{Conclusion}
256
257\begin{acknowledgements}
258Acknow text.
259\end{acknowledgements}
260
261%\appendix
262%
263%\section{Appendix section 1}
264%
265%Text in appendix.
266%
267
268\begin{thebibliography}{99}
269
270\bibitem[Heck and Knapp(1995)]{hk95}
271Heck, D. and Knapp J., CORSIKA Manual, 1995.
272
273\bibitem[Abramovitz and Stegun(1964)]{as64}
274Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions,
275U. S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington D. C., 1964.
276
277\bibitem[Aref(1983)]{a83}
278Aref, H., Integrable, chaotic, and turbulent vortex motion in
279two-dimensional flows, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 15, 345--389, 1983.
280
281\end{thebibliography}
282
283\end{document}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.