1 | \section{Introduction}
|
---|
2 |
|
---|
3 | \subsection{Observation of GRBs}
|
---|
4 |
|
---|
5 | The MAGIC telescope has been designed especially light with a special focus on
|
---|
6 | being able to react quickly to GRB alerts from the satellites.
|
---|
7 | In \cite{design} and~\cite{PETRY},
|
---|
8 | the objective was set to turn the telescope to the burst position within 10-30~s
|
---|
9 | in order to have a fair chance of detecting a burst when the emission is still ongoing.
|
---|
10 | During the comissioning phase we have proven that our goal was reached.
|
---|
11 | The telescope is able to turn 180 degrees in azimuth and 160 degrees in zenith within 20s.\\
|
---|
12 |
|
---|
13 |
|
---|
14 | Very high energy (VHE) GRB observations have the potential to constrain the theoretical models
|
---|
15 | on both the prompt and extendend phases of GRB emission~\cite{HARTMANN,MANNHEIM,SALOMON}. Models based on both internal and external shocks predicts VHE fluence comperable to, or certain situations stronger than, the keV-MeV radiation, with duration ranging from shorter than the keV-MeV burst to extended TeV afterglows~\cite{DERMER, PILLA, ZHANG1}.
|
---|
16 |
|
---|
17 | \par
|
---|
18 |
|
---|
19 | In many publications, the possibility that more energetic $\gamma$-rays come along with the (low-energy) GRB, have been explored. Proton-synchrotron emission~\cite{TOTANI} have been suggested as well as photon-pion production~\cite{WAXMAN,BAHCALL,BOETTCHER} and inverse-Compton scattering in the burst environment~\cite{MESZAROS93,CHIANG,PILLA,ZHANG2}.
|
---|
20 | Long-term HE $\gamma$ emission from accelerated protons in forward-shock has been predicted in~\cite{LI}. This model predicts GeV inverse compton emission even one day after the burst.
|
---|
21 | Even considering pure electron-synchrotron radiation predicts measurable GeV emission for a significant fraction of GRBs~\cite{ZHANG2}.\\
|
---|
22 |
|
---|
23 | GeV energy emission in GRBs is particulary sensitive to the Lorentz factor and to the photon density of the emitting material - and thus to the distance of the radiating shock from the source - owing to $\gamma~\gamma \rightarrow$
|
---|
24 | \textit{e$^+$~e$^-$} absorption in the emission region. And, Comparison of the prompt GRB flux at $\sim$ 1GeV and $\sim$ 100keV may allow to determine the magnetic field strength~\cite{ASAF1}.
|
---|
25 |
|
---|
26 | \par
|
---|
27 |
|
---|
28 | Several attempts have been made in the past to observe GRBs at energies from the GeV range upwards, each indicating some excess over background but without stringent evidence. The only secured detection was performed by EGRET which detected seven GRBs emitting high energy (HE) photons in the 100~MeV to 18~GeV range~\cite{EGRET}. The data shows no evidence of a HE rollover in the GRB spectrum~\cite{DINGUS}. Recent results indicate that the spectrum of some GRBs contains a very hard, luminous, long-duration component~\cite{GONZALES}.
|
---|
29 | There have been results suggesting gamma rays beyond the GeV range from the TIBET air shower array
|
---|
30 | in coincidence with BATSE bursts~\cite{AMENOMORI}, rapid follow-up observations by the Whipple Air Cerenkov Telescope~\cite{CONNAUGHTON1}, and coincident and monitoring studies by HEGRA-AIROBICC~\cite{PADILLA}, Whipple~\cite{CONNAUGHTON2} and the Milagro prototype~\cite{MILAGRO}.
|
---|
31 | The GRAND array has reported some excess of observed muons during seven BATSE bursts~\cite{GRAND}. In this context, note especially the publication from the TASC detector on \eg~\cite{GONZALES},
|
---|
32 | finding a HE spectral component presumably due to ultra-relativistic acceleration
|
---|
33 | of hadrons and producing a spectral index of $-1$ with no cut-off up to the detector limit (200 MeV).\\
|
---|
34 |
|
---|
35 | Concerning estimates about the MAGIC observability of GRBs, a very detailed study of GRB spectra obtained from the third and fourth \ba catalogue has been made in~\cite{ICRC,NICOLA}. The spectra were extrapolated to \ma energies with a simple continuation of the observed high-energy power law behaviour and the calculated fluxes compared with \ma sensitivities. Setting conservative cuts on observation times and significances,
|
---|
36 | and assuming an energy threshold of 15~GeV, a GRB detection rate of $0.5-2$ per year
|
---|
37 | was obtained for an assumed observation delay between 15 and 60 sec. and a BATSE trigger rate ($\sim 360/year$).
|
---|
38 |
|
---|
39 | Taking into account the local rate of GRBs estimated in~\cite{GUETTA}, an late afterglow emission from few tens of GRB's per year should be observable above our energy threshold. The model of Name~\cite{ASAF2} predict delayed GeV photon emission that should be significantly detectable by MAGIC in 100 seconds.
|
---|
40 |
|
---|
41 | \subsection{Observation of XRFs}
|
---|
42 |
|
---|
43 | While the major energy from the prompt GRBs is emitted in $\gamma$-rays ($E_p \sim$ 200~keV), XRFs are characterized
|
---|
44 | by peak energies below 50~keV and a dominated X-ray fluence. Because of similar properties a connection between XRFs and GRBs is strongly suggested. The most popular theories say that XRFs are produced from GRBs observed ''off-axis''.
|
---|
45 | Alternativly, an increase of the baryon load within the fireball itself or low efficiency shocks can produce XRFs. If there is a connection between the XRFs and GRBs, they should originate at low redshifts (z < 0.6).\\
|
---|
46 |
|
---|
47 | Gamma-ray satellites react in the same way on XRFs and GRBs. In case of a detection the coordinates are distributed to other observatories (see section 2.1). Only from later analysis the difference can be established.
|
---|
48 |
|
---|
49 | \par
|
---|
50 |
|
---|
51 | In this case we include also observation of XRFs by MAGIC in our proposal.
|
---|
52 |
|
---|
53 |
|
---|
54 |
|
---|