1 | \section{Proposed Observation Strategies}
|
---|
2 |
|
---|
3 | \subsection{Estimation of the Required Observation Time}
|
---|
4 |
|
---|
5 | A rough estimate of the needed observation time for GRBs derives
|
---|
6 | from the estimated number of GRB follow-up observations which can be
|
---|
7 | expressed in the following formula:
|
---|
8 |
|
---|
9 | \begin{equation}
|
---|
10 | N_{obs} = N_{alert} \cdot DC \cdot F_{overlap}
|
---|
11 | \end{equation}
|
---|
12 |
|
---|
13 | where $N_{obs}$ is the mean number of observed bursts, $N_{alert}$ the mean
|
---|
14 | number of sent alerts, $DC$ the duty cycle (including the reduction of sky coverage
|
---|
15 | due to the maximum allowed zenith angle) and $F_{overlap}$ a reduction factor due to
|
---|
16 | the non-overlapping sky coverage between the satellites and \ma. \\
|
---|
17 |
|
---|
18 | The claimed GRB observation frequency $N_{obs}(SWIFT)$ is predicted to about 150-200 GRBs/year
|
---|
19 | by the \sw collaboration~\cite{SWIFT}. We estimate $DC$ from studies on the \ma duty-cycle
|
---|
20 | made by Nicola Galante~\cite{NICOLA}.
|
---|
21 | The duty-cycle studies are based on real weather data from the year 2002 taking the following criteria:
|
---|
22 |
|
---|
23 | \begin{itemize}
|
---|
24 | \item maximum wind speeds of 10\,m/s
|
---|
25 | \item maximum humidity of 80\%
|
---|
26 | \item darkness at astronomical horizon
|
---|
27 | \end{itemize}
|
---|
28 |
|
---|
29 | In these duty-cycle studies also full-moon nights were considered (requiring
|
---|
30 | a minimum angular distance between the GRB and the moon of 30$^\circ$) yielding in
|
---|
31 | total 10\%.
|
---|
32 |
|
---|
33 | \par
|
---|
34 |
|
---|
35 | The duty-cycle in~\cite{NICOLA} will be increased by taking into account that \ma should also observe the
|
---|
36 | afterglow emission of an burst that occurred up to 5 hours before the start of the shift.
|
---|
37 | The afterglow observation is equivalent to an increase of the duty-cycle of about 6 days per month.
|
---|
38 | However, taking off the full-moon time, we remain with the anticipated 10\%.\\
|
---|
39 |
|
---|
40 | The overlap factor $F_{overlap}$ is difficult to estimate since the \sw satellite will continuously slew
|
---|
41 | to new sources or follow detected bursts. Figure~\ref{fig:orbit} shows that the satellite will pass very
|
---|
42 | precisely over La Palma during the night. Taking into account that it will not look towards the Sun,
|
---|
43 | we expect that $F_{overlap}(SWIFT)$ will be at least 0.5 or higher. \\
|
---|
44 |
|
---|
45 | In conclusion, we can calculate a worst case scenario with 150 \sw alerts per year and an overlap factor
|
---|
46 | of 0.5 yielding $N_{obs}^{min} \sim 0.6$/month.
|
---|
47 | An upper limit can be derived from 200 \sw alerts and a complete
|
---|
48 | overlap with $F_{overlap}(SWIFT) = 1$ yielding $N_{obs}^{max} \sim 1.6$/month.
|
---|
49 |
|
---|
50 | \subsection{Determine the Maximum Zenith Angle}
|
---|
51 |
|
---|
52 | We determine the maximum zenith angle for GRB observations by requiring that the overwhelming
|
---|
53 | majority of possible GRBs will have an in principle observable spectrum. Figure~\ref{fig:grh}
|
---|
54 | shows the gamma-ray horizon (GRH) as computed in~\cite{KNEISKE,SALOMON}. The GRH is defined as the
|
---|
55 | gamma-ray energy at which a part of $1/e$ of a hypothetical mono-energetic flux gets absorbed after
|
---|
56 | travelling a distance, expressed in redshift $z$, from the source. One can see that at typical
|
---|
57 | GRB distances of $z=1$, all gamma-rays above 100\,GeV get absorbed before they can reach the earth.
|
---|
58 |
|
---|
59 | \par
|
---|
60 |
|
---|
61 | Even the closest GRB with known redshift ever observed, GRB030329~\cite{GRB030329}, lies at a redshift
|
---|
62 | of $z=0.1685$. In this case $\gamma$-rays above 200\,GeV get entirely absorbed.
|
---|
63 |
|
---|
64 | \begin{figure}[htp]
|
---|
65 | \centering
|
---|
66 | \includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{f4.eps}
|
---|
67 | \caption{Gamma Ray Horizon as derived in~\cite{KNEISKE}}
|
---|
68 | \label{fig:grh}
|
---|
69 | \end{figure}
|
---|
70 |
|
---|
71 | \par
|
---|
72 |
|
---|
73 | We assume now a current energy threshold of 50\,GeV for \ma at a zenith angle of
|
---|
74 | $\theta = 0$\footnote{As this proposal is going to be reviewed in a couple of months, improvements of the energy threshold will be taken into account then.}. According to~\cite{ecl}, the energy threshold of a Cherenkov telescope scales with zenith angle like:
|
---|
75 |
|
---|
76 | \begin{equation}
|
---|
77 | E_{thr}(\theta) = E_{thr}(0) \cdot \cos(\theta)^{-2.7}
|
---|
78 | \label{eq:ethrvszenith}
|
---|
79 | \end{equation}
|
---|
80 |
|
---|
81 | Eq.~\ref{eq:ethrvszenith} leads to an energy threshold of about 5.6\,TeV at $\theta = 80^\circ$,
|
---|
82 | 900\,GeV at $\theta = 70^\circ$ and 500\,GeV at $\theta = 65^\circ$.
|
---|
83 | Inserting these results into the GRH (figure~\ref{fig:grh}), one gets a maximal observable GRB
|
---|
84 | distance of $z = 0.1$ at $\theta = 70^\circ$ and $z = 0.2$ at $\theta = 65^\circ$.
|
---|
85 | We think that the probability for GRBs to occur at these distances is sufficiently small in order to
|
---|
86 | neglect the very difficult observations beyond these limits.
|
---|
87 |
|
---|
88 | \subsection{GRB Observations in Case of Moon Shine}
|
---|
89 |
|
---|
90 | {\it gspot} allows only GRBs with an angular distance of $> 30^\circ$ from the moon.
|
---|
91 | The telescope's slewing in case of a GRB alert will be done
|
---|
92 | without closing the camera lids, so that the camera could be
|
---|
93 | flashed by the moon during such a movement. In principle
|
---|
94 | a fast moon-flash shouldn't damage the PMTs, but the behaviour
|
---|
95 | of the camera and the Camera Control {\it La Guagua} must
|
---|
96 | be tested. On the other hand, if such tests conclude that it is not safe
|
---|
97 | to get even a short flash from the moon, the possibility
|
---|
98 | to implement a new feature into the Steering System must be considered
|
---|
99 | which follow a path around the moon while slewing.
|
---|
100 |
|
---|
101 | \par
|
---|
102 |
|
---|
103 | There was a shift observing the Crab-Nebula with half-moon at La Palma in December 2004.
|
---|
104 | That experience showed that the nominal HV could be maintained and gave no
|
---|
105 | currents higher than 2\,$\mu$A. This means that moon-periods can be used for GRB-observations
|
---|
106 | without fundamental modifications except for full-moon periods. We want to stress that
|
---|
107 | these periods increase the chances to catch GRBs by 80\%.
|
---|
108 | It is therefore mandatory that the shifters keep the camera in fully operational conditions with
|
---|
109 | high-voltages switched on from the beginning of a half-moon night until the end.
|
---|
110 | This includes periods where no other half-moon observations are scheduled.
|
---|
111 | If no other data can be taken during the those periods, the telescope should be pointed
|
---|
112 | to a Northern direction, close to the zenith. This increases the probability to overlap
|
---|
113 | with the FOV of \sw.
|
---|
114 |
|
---|
115 | \par
|
---|
116 |
|
---|
117 | Because of higher background with moon-light, we suggest to decrease the maximum zenith angle from
|
---|
118 | $\theta_{max} = 70^\circ$ to $\theta_{max} = 65^\circ$, there.
|
---|
119 |
|
---|
120 | \subsection{Active Mirror Control Behaviour}
|
---|
121 |
|
---|
122 | To reduce the time before the start of the observation, the use of the look-up tables (LUTs) is necessary.
|
---|
123 | Once generated, the {\it AMC} will use the LUTs and automatically focus the panels for a given
|
---|
124 | telescope position. The {\it CC} should send the burst coordinates to the {\it Drive} and the {\it AMC}
|
---|
125 | software in the same time. In this way the panels could be focused already during the telescope movement.
|
---|
126 |
|
---|
127 | \subsection{Calibration}
|
---|
128 |
|
---|
129 | For ordinary source observation, the calibration is currently performed in the following way:
|
---|
130 |
|
---|
131 | \begin{itemize}
|
---|
132 | \item At the beginning of the source observation, a dedicated pedestal run followed by a calibration run is taken.
|
---|
133 | \item During the data runs, interlaced calibration events are taken at a rate of 50\,Hz.
|
---|
134 | \end{itemize}
|
---|
135 |
|
---|
136 | We would like to continue taking the interlaced calibration events when a GRB alert is launched, but leave out the pedestal and calibration run in order not to loose valuable time.
|
---|
137 |
|
---|
138 | \subsection{In case of Follow-up: Next Steps}
|
---|
139 |
|
---|
140 | We propose to analyze the GRB data at the following day in order to tell whether a follow-up observation during the next night is useful. We think that a limit of 3\,$\sigma$ significance should be enough to start such a follow-up observation of the same place. This follow-up observation can then be used in two ways:
|
---|
141 |
|
---|
142 | \begin{itemize}
|
---|
143 | \item In case of a repeated outbursts for a longer time period of direct observation.
|
---|
144 | \item In the other case for having off-data at exactly the same sky location.
|
---|
145 | \end{itemize}
|
---|
146 |
|
---|
147 | %%% Local Variables:
|
---|
148 | %%% mode: latex
|
---|
149 | %%% TeX-master: "GRB_proposal_2005"
|
---|
150 | %%% TeX-master: "GRB_proposal_2005"
|
---|
151 | %%% End:
|
---|