| 1 | \section{Proposed Observation Strategies}
|
|---|
| 2 |
|
|---|
| 3 | \ldots {\bf PRODUCE A PLOT WITH THE OVERLAP BETWEEN SWIFT AND MAGIC-- Markus Garcz. } \ldots
|
|---|
| 4 |
|
|---|
| 5 | \ldots {\bf PRODUCE PLOT WITH ESTIMATION OF MAX. ZENITH ANGLE DEP. ON GAMMA-RAY HORIZON } \ldots
|
|---|
| 6 |
|
|---|
| 7 | \ldots {\bf SIMULATE BURTS AND TRIGGER THEM WITH SWIFT AND MAGIC } \ldots
|
|---|
| 8 |
|
|---|
| 9 | \subsection{What to do with the AMC ? }
|
|---|
| 10 |
|
|---|
| 11 | \ldots {\bf MARKUS G. } \ldots
|
|---|
| 12 |
|
|---|
| 13 | \subsection{What to do with moon shine ? }
|
|---|
| 14 |
|
|---|
| 15 | \ldots {\bf NICOLA, HV TABLES, LIDS ... -- CAMERA EXPERTS - ECKART, RAZMIK, MANEL, JOSE} \ldots
|
|---|
| 16 |
|
|---|
| 17 | \subsection{Calibration }
|
|---|
| 18 |
|
|---|
| 19 | \ldots {\bf MARKUS gAUG} \ldots
|
|---|
| 20 |
|
|---|
| 21 | \subsection{Maximizing the duty cycle}
|
|---|
| 22 |
|
|---|
| 23 | \begin{verbatim}
|
|---|
| 24 | email Nicola Galante: \\
|
|---|
| 25 | \\
|
|---|
| 26 | I calculated duty-cycle with a Sun zenith angle greater
|
|---|
| 27 | than 105 deg, which means that Sun must be at least 15 deg below
|
|---|
| 28 | horizon, and not with an angle of 115 deg. I tried this calculation also
|
|---|
| 29 | with a limit of 108 deg, because a lot of people assume that the
|
|---|
| 30 | astronomical sunset is when the Sun is 18 deg below horizon. Using this
|
|---|
| 31 | assumption the calculated duty-cycle decreases of about 4\%(from 1.225 to
|
|---|
| 32 | 1.18 srad per year or from 9.75\% to 9.36\% vs 4pi srad per year). Anyway
|
|---|
| 33 | the definition of astronomical sunset influence the main cut on duty-cycle.
|
|---|
| 34 | About wind I can say that the data I used were provided by NOT, which is
|
|---|
| 35 | situated in a place more windy than where MAGIC is growing up. I made
|
|---|
| 36 | the calculation also with other upper limits to wind's speed then the
|
|---|
| 37 | usual 10 m/s, and we can gain quite a lot of duty-cycle (even about
|
|---|
| 38 | 1.5\%more vs 4pi srad per year) so it should be interesting to test the
|
|---|
| 39 | telescope during some windy or foggy days.
|
|---|
| 40 | \end{verbatim}
|
|---|
| 41 |
|
|---|
| 42 | \subsection{In case of follow-up: Next steps}
|
|---|
| 43 |
|
|---|
| 44 | Analysis during day:
|
|---|
| 45 | \par
|
|---|
| 46 | If some significance is seen, observe the same position next night to get some OFF-data.
|
|---|
| 47 |
|
|---|
| 48 |
|
|---|
