1 | \section{Timing considerations}
|
---|
2 |
|
---|
3 | The first experimental hint for delayed HE $\gamma$-ray emission from GRBs
|
---|
4 | came from the detection of a 18\,GeV photon from GRB940217 by the EGRET detector
|
---|
5 | -- 90\,min. after the onset of the burst~\cite{EGRET}.
|
---|
6 |
|
---|
7 | \par
|
---|
8 |
|
---|
9 | Different models predict prompt and delayed HE $\gamma$-ray emission.
|
---|
10 | Most of them predict HE photons parallel to the keV-MeV burst,
|
---|
11 | but also delayed emission is possible.
|
---|
12 | Our main goal should be to observe the GRB location as quickly as possible.
|
---|
13 | However, in order to confirm or rule out different predictions,
|
---|
14 | we should observe the position for a longer period of time. \\
|
---|
15 |
|
---|
16 | Our time estimates are based on the following models:
|
---|
17 |
|
---|
18 | \begin{itemize}
|
---|
19 |
|
---|
20 | \item Regarding the fireball model~\cite{REES1,REES2},
|
---|
21 | two efficient mechanisms are available for the generation of VHE photons~\cite{DERISHEV}.
|
---|
22 |
|
---|
23 | \begin{enumerate}
|
---|
24 | \item The prompt emission of $\sim$100\,GeV photons is expected before and during the keV-MeV peak.
|
---|
25 | This emission should have their highest luminosity together with the main GRB peak.
|
---|
26 | \item VHE photons generated due to inverse Compton (IC) scattering in relativistic shocks
|
---|
27 | are strongly absorbed by infrared background radiation and
|
---|
28 | cannot be observed from cosmological distances.
|
---|
29 | \end{enumerate}
|
---|
30 |
|
---|
31 | With the presence of a dense ambient medium close to the GRB,
|
---|
32 | the UHE photons will be reprocessed into a softer spectral range.
|
---|
33 | This would lead to VHE emission delayed by few minutes to hours with
|
---|
34 | respect to the beginning of GRB.
|
---|
35 | The time-line including both processes is illustrated in figure~\ref{fig:timeline}.
|
---|
36 |
|
---|
37 | \item In~\cite{DERMER}, two peaks in the GeV light curve are calculated.
|
---|
38 | The first is coincident with the keV-MeV peak, some seconds after the burst onset.
|
---|
39 | The second maximum peaks between $\approx$ 1.5 hours up to $\approx$ 25 hours after the burst onset.
|
---|
40 |
|
---|
41 | \item Models in~\cite{LI, WANG} suggest GeV emission after pion production and some thermalization
|
---|
42 | of the UHE component with radiation maxima of up to one day or even one week after the onset of the burst.
|
---|
43 | This radiation is accompanied by long-term neutrino emission.
|
---|
44 |
|
---|
45 | \end{itemize}
|
---|
46 |
|
---|
47 | \begin{figure}[htp]
|
---|
48 | \centering
|
---|
49 | \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{GRBbrigthness.eps}
|
---|
50 | \caption{A possible example of GRB time-line as depicted in~\cite{DERISHEV}}
|
---|
51 | \label{fig:timeline}
|
---|
52 | \end{figure}
|
---|
53 |
|
---|
54 | Based on the model in~\cite{DERISHEV}, three different components of VHE emission exists in an GRB.
|
---|
55 | The corresponding components are illustrated in figure~\ref{fig:timeline}.
|
---|
56 | (a) There is the prompt 100\,GeV peak before and during the first keV-MeV peak,
|
---|
57 | (b) the VHE emission due to Inverse Compton scattering lasting for the whole duration of the GRB pulse and
|
---|
58 | (c) the reprocessed Inverse Compton emission which may last up to hours after the GRB onset.
|
---|
59 | (b) and (c) are the components which may be detectable by \ma and other ground based $\gamma$-ray detectors.
|
---|
60 |
|
---|
61 | \par
|
---|
62 |
|
---|
63 | To achieve significant emission due to inverse Compton scattering
|
---|
64 | of the sub-MeV radiation, a minimal magnetic field $B_{min}$ is necessary:
|
---|
65 |
|
---|
66 | \begin{equation}
|
---|
67 | B_{min} \sim \frac{5\times10^{-2}}{\Gamma^{3}}\,
|
---|
68 | \frac{\epsilon_{2ph}}{1TeV}\,
|
---|
69 | \frac{t_{GRB}}{10s}\, G
|
---|
70 | \label{eq:minimal}
|
---|
71 | \end{equation}
|
---|
72 |
|
---|
73 | If the magnetic field is much stronger than $B_{min}$,
|
---|
74 | the delay of reprocessed photons may become observable.
|
---|
75 | For this perpendicular case it can be calculated via the following asymptotic expression:
|
---|
76 |
|
---|
77 | \begin{equation}
|
---|
78 | t_{d} \simeq \frac{2^{4/3}}{3} \biggl(\frac{B_{\perp}}{B_{min}}\biggl)^{2/3}
|
---|
79 | \label{eq:duration}
|
---|
80 | \end{equation}
|
---|
81 |
|
---|
82 | For typical values of the absorption threshold $\epsilon_{2ph}=1\,TeV$,
|
---|
83 | the duration time of GRB main pulse $t_{GRB}=10^{2}\,s$ and Lorentz factor of the GRB shell
|
---|
84 | $\Gamma=10^{2}$, the duration of delayed VHE emission will be 0.8 hours for the component of magnetic
|
---|
85 | field perpendicular to electron's trajectory $B_{\perp}=0.1\,Gauss$,
|
---|
86 | 3.6 hours for $B_{\perp}=1.0\,Gauss$ and 17.3 hours for $B_{\perp}=10\,Gauss$.\\
|
---|
87 |
|
---|
88 | The observation of the delayed VHE emission and the time correlation will give informations
|
---|
89 | about the density of the surrounding interstellar gas, the magnetic field and
|
---|
90 | the Lorentz factor of the GRB shell.\\
|
---|
91 |
|
---|
92 | It is not easy to determine a reasonable observation time of a GRB based on the described models.
|
---|
93 | Every burst has its own characteristic and time profile.
|
---|
94 | However, observation of the GRB coordinates for/within 5 hours after the alert may set
|
---|
95 | constraints on model parameters of GRB sources.\\
|
---|
96 |
|
---|
97 | In the case of an \textcolor{red}{\bf Red Alarm}, we propose to take data for {\bf 5 hours}.
|
---|
98 | \par
|
---|
99 | In the case of an \textcolor{yellow}{\bf Yellow Alarm},
|
---|
100 | we propose to observe the source from the time when it will become observable until the {\bf 5 hours} pass.
|
---|
101 |
|
---|
102 | %%% Local Variables:
|
---|
103 | %%% mode: latex
|
---|
104 | %%% TeX-master: "GRB_proposal_2005"
|
---|
105 | %%% TeX-master: "Timing"
|
---|
106 | %%% End:
|
---|