source: trunk/MagicSoft/Simulation/Detector/ReflectorII/doc/Tdas0211.tex@ 1679

Last change on this file since 1679 was 1672, checked in by bigongia, 22 years ago
*** empty log message ***
File size: 46.2 KB
Line 
1%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2%%% magic-tdas.tex -- template to write MAGIC-TDAS documents
3%%%-----------------------------------------------------------------
4%%% Kopyleft (K) 2000 J C Gonzalez
5%%% Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik,
6%%% Foehringer Ring 6, 80805 Muenchen, Germany
7%%% E-mail: gonzalez@mppmu.mpg.de
8%%%-----------------------------------------------------------------
9%%% This program is free software; you can redistribute, copy,
10%%% modify, use it and its documentation for any purpose,
11%%% provided that the above copyright notice appear in all
12%%% copies and that both that copyright notice and this
13%%% permission notice appear in supporting documentation.
14%%%
15%%% This piece of code is distributed in the hope that it will
16%%% be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the
17%%% implied warranty of FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
18%%%
19%%% Although you can actually do whatever you want with this
20%%% file (following the copyright notice above), your are
21%%% strongly encouraged NOT to edit directly this file.
22%%% Instead, make a copy and edit the copy for your purposes.
23%%%
24%%% Modifying thie original file means that you actually have
25%%% the (very basic) knowledge needed to make things by your
26%%% own, and therefore... you will not get _any_ additional
27%%% support :-)
28%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29%%% Last update: Time-stamp: <Thu Mar 2 09:31:41 CET 2000>
30%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31%
32\documentclass[12pt]{article}
33
34\usepackage{magic-tdas}
35
36%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37%% BEGIN DOCUMENT
38%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
39\begin{document}
40
41%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42%% Please, for the formatting just include here the standard
43%% elements: title, author, date, plus TDAScode
44%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45\title{ The Reflector simulation program v.0.6 }
46\author{A.Moralejo\\
47 \texttt{<moralejo@pd.infn.it>}}
48\date{December 6, 2002\\}
49\TDAScode{MAGIC-TDAS 02-11\\ 021206/AMoralejo}
50%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51
52%% title %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
53\maketitle
54
55%% abstract %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
56\begin{abstract}
57In this document we provide a brief description of Reflector program
58(version 0.6) and a guide to install and run it. Some of the
59information contained in this document is also present in MAGIC-TDAS
6002-05 dealing with the previous version of the program, but it has also
61been included here for clarity. Two important bugs regarding the
62ray-tracing routine have been corrected in this new version.
63\end{abstract}
64
65%% contents %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
66\thetableofcontents
67
68\newpage
69
70%% body %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
71
72%------------------------------------------------------------
73\section{Introduction}
74
75The Reflector program was originally written by Jose Carlos Gonz\'alez
76and then improved by Harald Kornmayer. The Reflector program reads in
77MMCS output files (cerxxxxxx files from corsika) and writes an output
78file with the information about all the photons which reach the
79telescope focal plane (taking into account atmospheric and mirror
80absorption) and which are within the camera radius defined in the file
81{\bf magic.def}. In September 2001 D. Bastieri and C. Bigongiari
82released a new version (v.0.4) to adapt the program to a format change
83in the MMCS output. In June 2002 the version 0.5 was released, with
84small changes in the ouput file format and some bug fixing (see TDAS
8502-05).
86\par
87The aim of releasing the present version 0.6 was in principle only to
88add some missing information in the output. However, the ray-tracing
89routine was checked in detail and some inconsistencies were
90found. As a result of this, an important bug was detected which
91produced a systematic blurring of all the images. Later another bug
92was found in the calculation of the photon arrival time on the
93camera.These bugs, fixed in this version, are discussed in detail in
94section \ref{notes}.
95
96%------------------------------------------------------------
97\section{Description of simulation \label{descrip}}
98
99The main steps of the simulation are:
100
101\begin{enumerate}
102
103\item Atmospheric absorption.
104
105\item Checking if the photon hits the dish.
106
107\item Aluminum absorption.
108
109\item Determination of the mirror hitted.
110
111\item Mirror reflection.
112
113\item Checking if the photon is inside the camera borders.
114
115\item Calculation of photon arrival time on camera.
116
117\end{enumerate}
118
119The reflection of each mirror element is simulated in a realistic way
120by introducing a gaussian spread of the reflected photons positions on
121the camera plane. The sigma of this PSF is defined via the
122{\bf point\_spread} parameter in the telescope description file {\bf
123magic.def}, and has a value of 0.5 cm, which corresponds approximately
124to the quality of the MAGIC mirrors produced up to date. Also the
125possible misalignment of mirror elements is simulated (see section
126\ref{neededfiles}).
127
128\section{Notes on version 0.6 \label{notes}}
129
130\subsection {First bug fixed in the ray tracing}
131
132The previous versions of the reflector were extensively checked and a
133strange behaviour was found in them. It is a well known fact (see for
134instance the discussions in the MAGIC design report) that, to focus a
135telescope on an object placed at a finite distance, one has to shift
136the camera plane {\it away} from the mirror dish, with respect to the
137position in which an object at infinity (a star) would be
138focused (see fig. \ref{colimation}). For instance, with a paraboloid
139of focal distance f = 1697 cm, an object placed 10 km above the
140telescope would be focused on a plane at $\simeq 1700$ cm from the
141dish (a distance measured along the telescope axis).
142%
143\begin{figure}[h!]
144 \begin{center}
145 \epsfig{file=eps/colimation.eps,width=0.7\textwidth}
146 \caption{To focus an object at a finite distance h, the camera plane
147must be moved away from the mirror a distance d, given by the formula
148on the right. For MAGIC, the shift is of around 3 cm for a source
149located 10 km above the telescope.\label{colimation}}
150 \end{center}
151\end{figure}
152%
153\par
154With reflector program up to version 0.5, and using the mirror
155parameters in the standard magic.def file, we found out just the
156opposite behaviour. We wrote a program to produce files with the same
157structure as the Corsika Cherenkov output, but containing photons from
158a point source. If we set the source at infinity, we found the best
159spot placing the camera at a distance of 1697 cm (this can be changed in
160the magic.def file via the {\it focal\_distance} parameter). We can
161see the resulting spot in fig. \ref{spot_inf_f1697}. A completely
162independent ray-tracing program was used to verify that this is the
163spot that our 17 m tesellated paraboloid should produce.
164%
165\begin{figure}[h]
166 \begin{center}
167 \epsfig{file=eps/spot_inf_f1697.eps,width=0.85\textwidth}
168 \caption{Image of a point like source placed at infinity with
169Reflector 0.5 (units of x and y are cm). Camera plane placed at 1697 cm
170from the mirror. The circle on the left indicates (small) pixel
171size. On the right side, projections on x and y of the
172spot. \label{spot_inf_f1697}}
173 \end{center}
174\end{figure}
175%
176If we now
177place the source 10 km above the telescope, the best spot is achieved
178at 1694 cm from the dish, instead of the expected 1700 cm
179(figs. \ref{spot10kmf1700} and \ref{spot10kmf1694}). It must be
180noted that for these and the following checks we removed all the
181gaussian smearing which the program introduces to simulate the
182possible mirror misalignments and surface irregularities (by the way,
183a feature which somehow optimistically was not included in the
184simulations shown in the proposal). In this way we can check just the
185ray tracing.
186%
187\begin{figure}[h!]
188 \begin{center}
189 \epsfig{file=eps/spot10kmf1700.eps,width=0.85\textwidth}
190 \caption{Image of a point like source placed 10 km above the
191telescope with Reflector 0.5 (units of x and y are cm). Camera plane
192placed at f = 1700 cm from the mirror. The fact that the spot is so large
193indicates a problem in the simulation, since with this camera position
194the telescope should be focused at 10 km (see
195fig. \ref{spot_inf_f1697}) and hence produce a spot similar to the one
196shown in fig. \ref{spot_inf_f1697}. The hole in the middle of the spot
197corresponds to the hole in the mirror dish, and indicates by itself a
198focusing problem.
199\label{spot10kmf1700}}
200 \end{center}
201\end{figure}
202%
203\begin{figure}[h!]
204 \begin{center}
205 \epsfig{file=eps/spot10kmf1694.eps,width=0.85\textwidth}
206 \caption{Image of a point like source placed 10 km above the
207telescope with Reflector 0.5 (units of x and y are cm). Camera plane
208placed at f = 1694 cm from the mirror. Now the spot is small, but the
209camera plane is not at the expected position (see text).
210\label{spot10kmf1694}}
211 \end{center}
212\end{figure}
213%
214\par
215In order to rule out a possible mistake in the generation of the
216``false'' Cherenkov files, we repeated the check using real Corsika
217files, and directly looking at shower images ($\Theta = 10^\circ$
218incident gammas with a Crab-like spectrum). We must bear in mind that
219the shower maximum for gammas of 100 GeV lies around 10 km above the MAGIC
220level. From the result we can clearly see that the images are best
221focused at 1694 cm (fig. \ref{evcompare}), therefore confirming the
222existence of a real problem in the reflector simulation.
223%
224\begin{figure}[p]
225 \begin{center}
226 \epsfig{file=eps/evcompare.eps,width=0.85\textwidth}
227 \caption{Gamma shower images obtained with Reflector 0.5 placing
228the camera at 1700 cm (left) and 1694 cm (right) from the mirror
229dish. Primary gammas at $\theta = 10^\circ$, E = 16, 46 and 232 GeV.
230\label{evcompare}}
231 \end{center}
232\end{figure}
233%
234\paragraph {Check of the mirror parameters in the magic.def file\\}
235In the standard magic.def file we have been using up to now, the
236spherical mirrors centers were found to be distributed on the surface
237of a f = 1700 cm paraboloid. Their curvature radii, though discretized
238in 8 ``zones'' as explained in the design report, corresponded in
239average to the local mean curvature radius of the same parabolic
240surface. However, their orientations were those corresponding to a f =
2411697 cm paraboloid. Personally I do not think this is something
242intended, and looks more like an error, but anyway we checked that this
243was not the reason for the problems in the ray tracing: a test
244magic.def file was created with all parameters calculated as for a f =
2451697 cm paraboloid, and no significant difference could be seen. That
246is: i) the individual mirror orientations are the dominant factor, and
247the overall dish in the old reflector behaved indeed like a f = 1697
248cm parabolic
249mirror, and ii) the bug must be somewhere else. Even though the error
250was not there, a new magic.def file has been produced containing the
251parameters for the 956 mirrors of the final MAGIC design (instead of
252the 920 mirrors foreseen in the beginning).
253%
254\paragraph {Solution of the problem\\}
255Finally, a check of the routines in {\it ph2cph.c} revealed that the
256reflector program was actually misinterpreting the information read
257from the Cherenkov file written by Corsika. In figure \ref{coorsystems}
258we can see the definition of Corsika's coordinate system (see also the
259Corsika manual). In it, the x axis points north and the z axis points
260up. The zenith angle $\Theta$ of a particle trajectory is measured
261between the particle momentum and the negative z-axis, and the
262azimuthal angle $\Phi$ between the positive x-axis and the x-y
263component of the particle momentum, counterclockwise (0 -
2642$\pi$). When the direction cosines of a particle's trajectory are
265given, they refer also to its momentum vector (a downgoing
266vector)\footnote{In Corsika the third component of the momentum is
267measured along the negative z-axis and this is probably the origin of
268the confusion which resulted in the bug}. The same is true for the
269Cherenkov photons.
270%
271\begin{figure}[h]
272 \begin{center}
273 \epsfig{file=eps/coorsystems.eps,width=\textwidth}
274 \caption{Coordinate systems of Corsika and MAGIC.\label{coorsystems}}
275 \end{center}
276\end{figure}
277%
278\begin{figure}[h!]
279 \begin{center}
280 \epsfig{file=eps/parabola.eps,width=0.6\textwidth}
281 \caption{Misunderstanding of photon direction cosines from Corsika
282by Reflector v 0.5 and older versions.\label{parabola}}
283 \end{center}
284\end{figure}
285%
286Unfortunately, in the output of Corsika, only the direction cosines
287(u, v) with respect to the x and y axis are given. These completely
288determine the particle's trajectory as long as one knows that they
289refer to a downgoing versor, in which case one gets the third
290direction cosine as $w = -\sqrt{u^2+v^2}$, with a minus sign. However,
291in {\it ph2cph.c} we found exactly the opposite (lines 116 to 118 in
292v.05):
293
294\begin{verbatim}
295 r[0] = ph->u;
296 r[1] = ph->v;
297 r[2] = (float) sqrt(1.0 - r[0]*r[0] - r[1]*r[1]);
298\end{verbatim}
299
300This means that the program was interpreting u and v as the direction
301cosines of the {\it upgoing} versor towards which one should ``look''
302to see the incoming photon. The situation is depicted in figure
303\ref{parabola}. The two vectors at the bottom left of the plot are the
304two possible interpretations of the direction cosines u and v. These
305vectors have the same u and v, and differ only in the sign of their
306third components w. As the figure illustrates, the reflector
307simulation, by taking the wrong (positive) sign of w, was transforming
308the light coming from a point source 10 km away, into a convergent
309light beam which was then focused at a distance (1694 cm),
310shorter than the focal length of the paraboloid, and produced a
311blurred image at the theoretically optimal distance (1700 cm). Of
312course a paralel beam of light was focused at the right distance (1697
313cm) since in that case u = v = 0, and both the upgoing and downgoing
314versors have the same direction.
315\par
316The example in figure \ref{parabola} shows the case in which the
317telescope is pointing at zenith. It is easy to see that if the
318telescope was pointing in an arbitrary direction a few degrees away
319from zenith, the fact of taking the wrong sign in the third direction
320cosine would spoil the reflection completely, to the point that the
321spot would lie outside the camera limits. However, this is not what we
322observed: when using the older reflector versions for different zenith
323angles the images were still contained in the camera. The explanation
324is that the transformation between Corsika's coordinates system and
325the telescope system was also wrong, since the angles $\Phi$ and
326$\Theta$ which indicate the telescope orientation (see fixed\_target
327option in section \ref{commands}) follow the same convention taken
328from Corsika: for instance, for pointing the telescope towards North
329we should set $\Phi = 180^\circ$, because that would be the $\Phi$
330value for a particle or photon coming from North (see again
331fig. \ref{coorsystems}, left). This wrong transformation of coordinates
332oriented the telescope in a way that the situation was always like the
333one shown in fig. \ref{parabola}, and the image was formed in the
334camera also for $\Theta > 0$, though also defocused.
335\par
336The telescope coordinate system shown in figure \ref{coorsystems}
337(right) has its z-axis along the telescope axis, and the origin in the
338center of the mirror dish. This system is used in the ray tracing
339routine of the reflector simulation. When the telescope points up
340($\Theta = \Phi = 0$) this system matches exactly the one in Corsika.
341The general transformation between both is a simple rotation,
342since for the sake of simplicity we assume in the simulation that the
343origins always coincide. In Reflector v.05 or older the rotation
344matrix was wrong: it had been written assuming that ($\Phi$, $\Theta$)
345indicated the direction towards which the telescope pointed. Actually,
346for the reasons already exposed, the telescope must point to
347($\Phi +\pi$, $\Theta$). The function in charge of building the rotation
348matrix is {\it makeOmega} (a part of {\it ph2cph.c}), which is called
349from {\it reflector.c}. For the present version we have simply
350replaced $\Phi$ by $\Phi + \pi$ in the function call. The transformation of
351coordinates is shown in figure \ref{telecoor}, and can be seen as a
352rotation of angle $\Phi +\pi$ around the z axis of Corsika plus a
353rotation of angle $\Theta$ around the y'' axis of the telescope (the
354same way in which the real MAGIC points).
355%
356\paragraph {New coordinate system of the camera \label{newcoordi}}
357We have introduced another change in Reflector 0.6 regarding the
358coordinates. In versions up to 0.5 the coordinates ($x_{camera}$,
359$y_{camera}$) of the photon impact point on the camera plane were
360given in the telescope system (x'', y'', z'') described in
361fig. \ref{coorsystems}. This was a bit confusing (a rotation of the
362telescope in the zenith axis resulted in a displacement in x'' of the
363images), in particular it would have been messy when working in wobble
364mode. We have now adopted the camera coordinate system proposed in
365TDAS 01-05: when the observer is looking from the center of the
366reflector in the direction of the telescope axis (towards the camera)
367the $x_{camera}$ axis points horizontally to the right, and the
368$y_{camera}$ axis points upwards. It is trivial from figure
369\ref{telecoor} to see that the transformation needed to obtain these
370coordinates is: $x_{camera} = -y''$, $\:y_{camera} = -x''$. This has been
371added at the end of {\it ph2cph.c}.
372%
373\begin{figure}[h]
374 \begin{center}
375 \epsfig{file=eps/telecoor.eps,width=\textwidth}
376 \caption{Transformation of coordinates between the Corsika and
377MAGIC coordinate systems.\label{telecoor}}
378 \end{center}
379\end{figure}
380%
381\paragraph {How old was the ray-tracing bug?\\}
382%
383The bug was certainly present in versions 0.4 and 0.5, but may be even
384older. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the reflector program used
385for the simulation shown in the MAGIC design report (which must have been
386an early version of the present one) was working fine. Extensive proof
387of this is provided in an appendix of the design report. A plausible
388explanation could be that, up to some date, the data being read in by
389the reflector program (the Corsika output) contained direction cosines
390which really referred to the upgoing versors of the photon directions,
391and until then the program worked well. Then may be the output of
392Corsika was changed to its present form, and the change went unnoticed.
393The Corsika version used then was 4.52, whereas all further work has
394been done with Corsika 5.20 or later versions. The Corsika history
395file shows no record of any change in this respect, but given that we
396have always used a slightly modified Corsika, it would not be
397surprising if the Cherenkov output was modified at some point. There
398is no documentation on this, so if anyone has any relevant information,
399please make it public.
400%
401\paragraph {Influence of the bug on image analysis\\}
402The fixing of the bug (resulting in sharper images) will for sure
403improve the results of the image analysis, in particular with regard
404to gamma / hadron separation. This could in part explain the
405differences we have been observing in the expected performance of
406MAGIC with respect to what was foreseen in the design report. However,
407we note here again that in the simulation used there, not only was the
408reflector working well, but also no noise was introduced in the
409reflecting process. This was surely too optimistic, and it implies
410that it will be hard to reproduce those results using a more realistic
411approach which accounts for mirror imperfections. However, the
412introduction of the noise (fig. \ref{refl06images}) has a less
413dramatic effect than the defocusing which the bug was producing.
414%
415\subsection {Second bug: photon timing}
416After a first release of Reflector 0.6 had been made public, another
417important bug was found. We tried to check whether the simulated
418reflecting dish was really ``isochronous''. A paralel beam of photons,
419all sharing the same arrival time on the ground, were processed by the
420simulation program and their arrival times on the camera plane were
421histogrammed. The result can be seen in fig. \ref{timing} (dashed
422histograms). This time the bug was quite evident: since Corsika gives
423us the arrival time of photons on ground, the path from the point
424where the photon hits the dish to the ground has to be subtracted (or
425added, because since the center of the dish in the MC is at $z = 0$,
426the mirror reflecting the photon may have $z < 0$ when the dish is
427inclined). The sign in this subtraction (in {\it ph2cph.c}) was
428wrong. This bug was present in both versions 0.5 and 0.4, and might
429be related to the other one (a change of orientation of the z axis
430at some point may have produced it). Since in the simulation made for
431the design report the timing played little or no role (the camera
432simulation did not consider the arrival times of photons) it is not
433possible to know whether the bug was already in the code by then.
434\par
435This bug means that all the studies made up to now regarding photon
436arrival times on the camera are completely useless (for instance, the
437optimization of the time parameters in the L1 trigger has to be redone
438from scratch!).
439%
440\begin{figure}[h]
441 \begin{center}
442 \epsfig{file=eps/timing.eps,width=\textwidth}
443 \caption{Test of reflector isochrony. The arrival time
444distributions of photons in the camera are shown for (buggy) Reflector
4450.5 and for Reflector 0.6. The sketch in the center shows the test for
446the case in which the light beam is paralel to the telescope axis
447(left plot). On the right, the same test has been made with light
448arriving 1 degree off axis.
449 \label{timing}}
450 \end{center}
451\vspace*{-1cm}
452\end{figure}
453
454\subsection {Performance of the new version}
455In figure \ref{coma} we show the images of a point-like source at 10
456km from the telescope, produced with the Reflector version 0.6,
457and using the new version of the magic.def file (see see next
458section). No noise has been introduced in the reflection, the observed
459spots are just the result of optical aberrations. The light source has
460been put at slightly different viewing angles
461from the telescope. The results are comparable to those in the design
462report, actually these are a bit better, the difference probably being
463that the focal lengths of the mirror tiles in the older magic.def file
464were discretized in only eight values, while now they change rather
465continuously. Some images of a point source at infinity (a star) can be
466seen in fig. \ref{coma_star}. We can see that for any incidence angle,
467the area within which 50$\%$ of the light is concentrated is smaller
468than that of a small pixel.
469\par
470In figure \ref{refl06images} the images of three gamma events ($\theta
471= 10^\circ$, E = 16, 46, 232 GeV), the same of fig. \ref{evcompare}
472are shown. They have been produced with Reflector 0.6 assuming perfect
473spherical mirrors (left) and realistic ones (right). The images look
474reasonable, much sharper than with the older versions, even when the
475mirror imperfections are taken into account.
476\par
477%
478\begin{figure}[p]
479 \begin{center}
480 \epsfig{file=eps/coma.eps,width=0.85\textwidth}
481 \caption{Reflector 0.6. Images of a point-like source at
48210 km from the telescope for different incident angles (from on-axis
483to 2 degrees off-axis). The quantity d50 indicates the diameter of a
484circle (plotted) containing 50$\%$ of the reflected light. Note that
485the z-axis scale is logarithmic, and the same in the first five
486plots. The last plot shows the x-axis projections in linear scale.
487 \label{coma}}
488 \end{center}
489\vspace*{-1cm}
490\end{figure}
491%
492\begin{figure}[p]
493 \begin{center}
494 \epsfig{file=eps/refl06images.eps,width=0.85\textwidth}
495 \caption{Reflector 0.6. Images of the three gamma showers shown in
496fig. \ref{evcompare}, without noise added in the reflection (left) and
497with the standard noise (right) as described in section
498\ref{descrip}. Note that the orientation of the images has changed as a
499result of the introduction of a new camera coordinate system (see page
500\pageref{newcoordi}).
501 \label{refl06images}}
502 \end{center}
503\vspace*{-1cm}
504\end{figure}
505%
506\begin{figure}[p]
507 \begin{center}
508 \epsfig{file=eps/coma_star.eps,width=0.85\textwidth}
509 \caption{Reflector 0.6. Images of a star. The quantity d50
510indicates the diameter of a circle (plotted) containing 50$\%$ of the
511reflected light.
512 \label{coma_star}}
513 \end{center}
514\vspace*{-1cm}
515\end{figure}
516%
517\subsection{The new magic.def file}
518A new magic.def file (see sect. \ref{neededfiles}) has been created
519and included in the Reflector 0.6 package. Now the number of
520individual mirror tiles is 956, matching
521the number and distribution of the final MAGIC design. The mirror
522centers and orientations are those corresponding to a paraboloid of
5231697 cm focal (hence the camera plane is placed at 1700 cm from the
524dish). The focal lengths have been calculated by R. Mirzoyan taking
525into account the so called ``shortening effect'' (see design report).
526A new axisdev.dat file (se again \ref{neededfiles}) with data for the
527956 mirrors is also included.
528%
529\subsection{The {\itshape cermaker} program}
530A test program to produce cer files (input for the reflector)
531containing photons from a point-light source of light placed in any
532position has been added to the Reflector package {\it
533(tester/cermaker.c)}. This is the same program used to produce the
534plots shown in this report. The usage is as follows:
535\begin{verbatim}
536cermaker source_x(cm) source_y(cm) source_z(cm) [events]
537\end{verbatim}
538The source position is given with respect to the telescope. The output
539file is called {\it cer000001}, and can be read by the reflector program.
540%
541\subsection{Other changes in Reflector 0.6}
542
543Some other minor improvements have been introduced in Reflector 0.6:
544
545\begin{enumerate}
546
547\item reflector.c: Introduced NaN (Not a Number) check in the photon
548loop. If NaNs are found in a photon data block (there are some in the
549Corsika output from time to time, for unkown reason), it is not processed.
550
551\item ph2cph.c: Introduced "check of positiveness" before taking a
552square root in the calculation of the photon trajectory intersection
553with the paraboloid (resulted sometimes in NaNs when the photon did
554not intersect the paraboloid).
555
556\item Added an option for the wobble mode in the input card (see
557section \ref{opt}).
558
559\item New output format (see sect. \ref{out}): added a Run header,
560which is like that of Corsika, plus a couple of variables concerning
561the reflector parameters: the wobble mode and the atmospheric model
562used for the simulation. The event header has also been changed to
563include all the information present in the Corsika event
564header. We also added in the event header three new variables which
565tell us for each event what fraction of the Cherenkov photons on the
566camera plane has been produced by electrons, muons, or other
567particles.
568\par
569Finally, the ascii files {\it magic.def}, {\it
570axisdev.dat} and {\it reflectivity.dat} which the program has used as
571input are now attached at the end of the output file, so that each
572output file contains all the relevant information on how it was
573produced.
574
575\end{enumerate}
576
577%------------------------------------------------------------
578\section{How to Install Reflector Program \label{installation}}
579
580You can get the current version of the Reflector Program from the
581MAGIC web page: \\
582{\bf http://hegra1.mppmu.mpg.de/MAGICWeb/ }\\
583You can find
584the latest public version of this program as tarred gzipped file in
585the Monte Carlo Download area (you need the usual password). You have to
586download the file reflector\_0.6.tar.gz and then follow the
587instructions below:
588
589\begin{description}
590\item[Decompress the file using:]
591 gunzip reflector*.tar.gz
592\item[Unpack the tar file with:]
593 tar xvf reflector*.tar
594\item[Go to the directory where the source files are:]
595 cd MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector\_0.6/
596\item[Make symbolic links running the script:]
597 refl-install
598\item[Check if all dependencies are fulfilled:]
599 make depend
600\item[Compile the program:]
601 make
602\end{description}
603
604If everything goes right you should have an executable file called
605{\bf reflector}.
606
607%------------------------------------------------------------
608\section{How to Run Reflector Program \label{running}}
609
610You need a steering card to run the Reflector program. You can find an
611example in the {\bf MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector\_0.6/input.card}
612file. You have to modify this file according to your needs (see below
613for instructions about steering card) and then run the program with the
614following statement:\\
615
616\hspace{1cm}{\bf reflector $<$ input.card}
617
618%------------------------------------------------------------
619\section{Needed Files \label{neededfiles}}
620
621The Reflector program needs some other files to run. These files are
622the following:
623\begin{itemize}
624\item {\bf magic.def}: contains the description of MAGIC telescope
625geometry, together with some other parameters needed by the Reflector
626program.
627\item {\bf axisdev.dat}: contains data to simulate the possible
628deviation of the spot of each single mirror on the camera plane due
629to its non perfect alignment. The values are x, y coordinates
630distributed at random (according to a gaussian with $\sigma =
6310.5$ cm).
632\item {\bf reflectivity.dat}: contains the mirror reflectivity index as
633a function of the wavelength.
634\end{itemize}
635
636All these files are usually in the {\bf
637MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Data/} directory and {\it in principle} you
638should {\bf not} make any change in them to run the program.
639
640%------------------------------------------------------------
641\section{Steering Card}
642
643The steering card sets all the parameters and options
644to steer the reflection simulation. Each line of the steering card is
645a statement with its parameters, if it is the case. Lines beginning
646with \# are considered comments. The Reflector program parses all the
647lines sequentially. Then if you repeat a statement with different
648options only the last one will be considered.
649
650\subsection{Mandatory Commands \label{commands}}
651
652\begin{description}
653
654\item[reflector 0.6]
655
656 This statement must be the first line of the steering card
657 file. The Reflector program checks it to verify if it is reading
658 a steering card.
659
660\item[output\_file /disk99/reflex/Gamma\_0\_7\_1001to1010\_w0.rfl]
661
662 The output\_file command specifies the name and the
663 path of the output file. The path can be absolute, like in the
664 example above, or relative. Although any name can be used,
665 conventionally the Reflector program
666 output file name has the .rfl extension, and starts with
667 the primary particle name. The first number indicates the
668 zenith angle of the incident primaries, the second one
669 indicates the production site (7 is for Padua) and is related
670 to the random number generator seed used by CORSIKA. Then the run
671 number range is shown (10 runs in this case, from 1001 to
672 1010). Each run corresponds to 10000 showers. Finally, the
673 label "w0" means no wobble mode was used (telescope pointing
674 at the source). Alternatively, the "w+" or "w-" labels (only
675 in gamma files) refer to the two pointings in the
676 Wobble-observation mode (see TDAS 01-05 by W. Wittek).
677
678\item[ct\_file ../Data/magic.def]
679
680 The ct\_file statement defines where the program can find the
681 telescope characteristics. The path in the example above is
682 correct to run reflector in
683 MagicProgs/Simu\-la\-tion/De\-tector/Reflector\_0.6/ directory.
684 If you want to run it in a different directory you have to modify the
685 path accordingly.
686
687\item[atm\_model ATM\_CORSIKA]
688 The atm\_model statement says to the program what kind of
689 atmospheric absorption model to use. Possible choices are:
690 ATM\_CORSIKA, ATM\_ISO\-THERMAL, ATM\_90\-PER\-CENT and
691 ATM\_NO\-ATMO\-SPHE\-RE.
692
693\item[cer\_files]
694
695 All the lines following this statement are considered files to
696 be processed by the Reflector program, one for each line,
697 eventually with their paths (see the example below). Therefore this
698 command must be the last one.\\
699 \\
700 cer\_files\\
701 /disk99/cer001001\\
702 /disk99/cer001002\\
703 /disk99/cer001003\\
704 ........ \\
705 /disk99/cer001009\\
706 /disk99/cer001010\\
707 \\
708 The cer file name can be followed by two numbers, for example:
709 \\
710 /disk99/cer001001 376 5723\\
711 \\
712 In this case the program processes only the events between and
713 including the numbers given.
714
715\end{description}
716
717\subsection{Optional Commands \label{opt}}
718
719\begin{description}
720
721\item[verbose\_level 1]
722
723 Sets the quantity of information printed out by Reflector
724 when running. Possible values are 0 to 4
725
726\item[max\_events 50000]
727
728 Fixes the maximum number of events to process.
729
730\item[energy\_cuts 100 1000]
731
732 This statement forces the Reflector to process only showers
733 with primary energy between the given values (GeV).
734
735\item[seeds n1 n2]
736
737 Seeds for the random number generators to used by the program
738 for the simulation of the absorption (both in the atmosphere
739 and on the mirror). Default values are 3141592 and
740 2718182.
741
742\item[telescope\_position x y]
743
744 Option included in version 0.5 of Reflector. Usually it is
745 not needed, since for normal MC production for MAGIC the
746 telescope is placed at the origin of coordinates (0,0). But,
747 if for some reason, we produce cerxxxxxx files with the
748 telescope in a different position, we must inform the
749 Reflector program in the input card using this option
750 (otherwise Reflector will fail to {\it find} the photons
751 in the cer file).
752
753\item[reflectivity\_file /path/reflectivity.dat]
754
755 File containing mirror reflectivity as a function of
756 wavelength (see section \ref{neededfiles}). If this option is
757 not supplied, the program will look for
758 ``../Data/reflectivity.dat'' as previous versions of
759 Reflector did.
760
761\item[axisdev\_file /path/axisdev.dat]
762
763 File containing single mirror spot deviation in {\bf x} and
764 {\bf y} on the camera in cm (see section
765 \ref{neededfiles}) for each mirror. If this option is not
766 supplied, the program will look for ``../Data/axisdev.dat''
767 as previous versions of Reflector did.
768
769\item[fixed\_target $\Theta$ $\Phi$]
770
771 This statement fixes the telescope axis position. The first
772 number is the zenith angle $\Theta$ (deg) while the second is
773 the azimuthal angle $\Phi$ (deg). This corresponds to {\it
774 CORSIKA}'s definition of primary particle incident direction
775 (see fig. \ref{coorsystems}, left). For instance, $\phi = 90^\circ$
776 means that the telescope is pointing towards East. If this
777 option is omitted the telescope will always point in the
778 direction of the Corsika primary (whatever it is), or a
779 slightly modified direction if the wobble\_mode option is used
780 (see next point). When running the reflector over gamma data
781 generated in a range of zenith angles, one should therefore
782 ommit the fixed\_target option.
783
784\item[wobble\_mode w]
785
786 Indicates whether the reflection should be done in the wobble
787 mode, that is, with shifted pointing with respect to the
788 nominal telescope orientation (given by fixed\_target or
789 otherwise, see above). The wobble mode is described in TDAS
790 01-05. Possible values for w are 0 (no wobble mode), 1, -1
791 (image shift along $x_{camera}$ axis) and 3 (image shift along
792 $y_{camera}$ axis).
793
794\end{description}
795
796%------------------------------------------------------------
797
798\newpage
799\section{Output file \label{out}}
800The output file begins with two ascii lines:\\
801\\
802\verb"reflector 0.6" \\
803\verb"START---RUN" \\
804After the \verb"START---RUN" flag there is a carriage return, and then
805the run header which is basically the one from Corsika with two added
806variables, {\it wobble\_mode} and {\it atmospheric\_model}. Check the
807Corsika manual for the meaning and units of the rest of them. All of the
808variables 4-byte real numbers except the first, which is a 4 character
809string containing the run header ascii label from Corsika:
810\vspace*{0.5cm}
811\\
812%
813\begin{tabular}{ll}
814\parbox{5cm}{Variable} & Description \\
815\hline
816& \\
817ASCII Label & 'RUNH' \\
818RunNumber & \\
819date & \\
820Corsika\_version & \\
821NumObsLev & \\
822HeightLev[10] & \\
823SlopeSpec & \\
824ELowLim & \\
825EUppLim & \\
826EGS4\_flag & \\
827NKG\_flag & \\
828Ecutoffh & \\
829Ecutoffe & \\
830Ecutoffg & \\
831C[50] & \\
832wobble\_mode & Wobble mode with which the reflector was run (TDAS
83301-05) \\
834atmospheric\_model & Atmospheric model used for the absorption
835simulation \\
836& 0 = no atmosphere; 1 = atm\_90percent; \\
837& 2 = atm\_isothermal; 3 = atm\_corsika. \\
838dummy1[18] & not used \\
839CKA[40] & \\
840CETA[5] & \\
841CSTRBA[11] & \\
842dummy2[104] & not used \\
843AATM[5] & \\
844BATM[5] & \\
845CATM[5] & \\
846NFL[4] & \\
847&\\
848\hline
849\end{tabular}
850
851\newpage
852
853Then there comes a ``\verb"START-EVENT"'' flag, followed by a carriage
854return and then the binary event header. Each variable is a 4-byte
855float number except for the first one which is the event header label
856from Corsika (a string of 4 characters). Some of of the variables from
857Corsika are not explained here (see Corsika manual instead).
858\vspace*{0.5cm}
859\\
860\begin{tabular}{ll}
861\parbox{5cm}{Variable} & Description \\
862\hline
863& \\
864ASCII label & 'EVTH' \\
865EvtNumber & Event Number \\
866PrimaryID & Primary particle identification code \\
867Etotal & Primary particle total energy (GeV) \\
868Thick0 & CORSIKA's starting altitude in g/cm2 \\
869FirstTarget & CORSIKA's number of first target if fixed \\
870zFirstInt & Height of first interaction in cm \\
871p[3] & Primary particle momentum in x,y,-z directions (GeV) \\
872Theta & Primary particle zenith angle (rad) \\
873Phi & Primary particle azimuth angle (rad) \\
874
875NumRndSeq & Number of different CORSIKA random sequences (max. 10) \\
876RndData[10][3] & RndData[i][0]: integer seed of sequence i \\
877 & RndData[i][1]: number of offset random calls (mod $10^6$) of sequence i. \\
878 & RndData[i][2]: number of offset random calls ($/10^6$) of sequence i. \\
879
880RunNumber & Run number \\
881DateRun & Date of run yymmdd \\
882Corsika\_version & Version of {\it CORSIKA} \\
883
884NumObsLev & Number of observation levels (should be always 1 for
885us) \\
886HeightLev[10] & Height of observation levels in cm \\
887
888SlopeSpec & Energy spectrum slope \\
889ELowLim & Energy lower limit (GeV) \\
890EUppLim & Energy upper limit (GeV) \\
891Ecutoffh & \\
892Ecutoffm & \\
893Ecutoffe & \\
894Ecutoffg & \\
895NFLAIN & \\
896NFLDIF & \\
897NFLPI0 & \\
898NFLPIF & \\
899NFLCHE & \\
900NFRAGM & \\
901Bx & \\
902By & \\
903EGS4yn & \\
904NKGyn & \\
905GHEISHAyn & \\
906VENUSyn & \\
907& \\
908\hline
909\end{tabular}
910%
911\newpage
912%
913
914\begin{tabular}{ll}
915
916\parbox{5cm}{Variable} & Description \\
917\hline
918& \\
919CERENKOVyn & \\
920NEUTRINOyn & \\
921HORIZONTyn & \\
922COMPUTER & \\
923
924ThetaMin & Minimum Theta of primaries (deg) \\
925ThetaMax & Maximum Theta of primaries (deg) \\
926PhiMin & Minimum Phi of primaries (deg) \\
927PhiMax & Maximum Phi of primaries (deg) \\
928CBunchSize & \\
929CDetInX & \\
930CDetInY & \\
931CSpacInX & \\
932CSpacInY & \\
933CLenInX & \\
934CLenInY & \\
935COutput & \\
936AngleNorthX & \\
937MuonInfo & \\
938StepLength & \\
939CWaveLower & Wavelength lower limit (nm) \\
940CWaveUpper & Wavelength upper limit (nm) \\
941Multipl & \\
942CorePos[2][20] & Core positions of randomized shower \\
943SIBYLL[2] & \\
944QGSJET[2] & \\
945DPMJET[2] & \\
946VENUS\_cross & \\
947mu\_mult\_scat & \\
948NKG\_range & \\
949EFRCTHN[2] & \\
950WMAX[2] & \\
951rthin\_rmax & \\
952viewcone\_angles[2] & Inner and outer angles of Corsika's VIEWCONE
953option. \\
954telescopePhi & Telescope azimuth (rad). Measured from South, counter-clockwise \\
955telescopeTheta & Telescope zenith angle (rad) \\
956TimeFirst & Arrival time on camera of first photon (ns) \\
957TimeLast & Arrival time on camera of last photon (ns) \\
958
959& 6 next variables: CORSIKA longitudinal particle fit parameters \\
960& \hspace{0.5cm} (see CORSIKA manual for precise meaning and units)\\
961longi\_Nmax & Numer of charged particles at maximum \\
962longi\_t0 & Atmospheric depth of shower starting point (N=0) \\
963longi\_tmax & Atmospheric depth of shower maximum (g/cm$^2$) \\
964longi\_a & \\
965longi\_b & For {\bf longi\_a}, {\bf longi\_b}, {\bf longi\_c}, see CORSIKA manual \\
966longi\_c & \\
967longi\_chi2 & $\chi^2/dof$ of the fit\\
968& \\
969\hline
970\end{tabular}
971
972\newpage
973
974\begin{tabular}{ll}
975\parbox{5cm}{Variable} & Description \\
976\hline
977& \\
978CORSIKAPhs & Original photons written by {\it CORSIKA} \\
979AtmAbsPhs & Photons absorbed by the atmosphere \\
980MirrAbsPhs & Photons absorbed by the mirror \\
981OutOfMirrPhs & Photons outside the mirror \\
982BlackSpotPhs & Photons lost in the "black spot" \\
983OutOfChamPhs & Photons outside the camera \\
984CPhotons & Photons reaching the camera \\
985
986elec\_cph\_fraction & Fraction of C-photons produced by electrons \\
987muon\_cph\_fraction & Fraction of C-photons produced by muons \\
988other\_cph\_fraction & Fraction of C-photons produced by electrons \\
989& \\
990\hline
991\end{tabular}
992
993\vspace*{1cm}
994The event header is followed by 8-word blocks, one for each photon
995that reaches the camera. A photon block contains the following
996variables:
997\vspace*{0.5cm}
998\\
999\begin{tabular}{ll}
1000Variable & Description \\
1001\hline
1002& \\
1003w & 100000 $\times$ Particle\_type + 1000 $\times$ n + Wavelength (nm) \\
1004 & Particle\_type indicates what particle produced the C-photon. Its value is 2 for electrons \\
1005 & and positrons, and the standard codes of Corsika for the rest. \\
1006 & n is the index from 1 to ICERML (see Corsika manual) for the case in which each Corsika \\
1007 & shower is used more than once (normally, in MMCS will be just 1). \\
1008 & \\
1009x, y & Impact point in camera coordinates (cm) \\
1010u, v & Director cosines of down-going versor indicating the photon direction \\
1011t & Arrival time on camera (ns) \\
1012h & Production height (cm) \\
1013phi & Incidence angle with respect to camera plane (rad) \\
1014& \\
1015\hline
1016\end{tabular}
1017\vspace*{0.5cm}
1018\\
1019After the last event photon block there is a blank line, an \verb$END---EVENT$
1020flag, another blank line and then the following event. After the last
1021event in a run it appears the flag ``\verb$END-----RUN$'', while after all
1022the processed runs, a ``\verb$END----FILE$'' flag is written. Finally,
1023after this flag an ``ascii tail'' has been added to the file: it
1024consists of the ascii files {\it magic.def}, {\it axisdev.dat} and {\it
1025reflectivity.dat} one after the other separated by blank lines. In
1026this way all the relevant parameters used to produce the output are
1027kept together with the reflected events.
1028
1029%------------------------------------------------------------
1030
1031\section{Appendix A}
1032
1033The list of all Reflector files follows.
1034\begin{verbatim}
1035
1036MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/Changelog
1037MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/Makefile
1038MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/atm.c
1039MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/atm.h
1040MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/attach.c
1041MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/attenu.f
1042MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/config.mk.linux
1043MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/config.mk.linux-gnu
1044MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/config.mk.osf1
1045MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/diag.c
1046MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/diag.h
1047MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/geometry.c
1048MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/geometry.h
1049MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/header.c
1050MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/header.h
1051MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/init.c
1052MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/init.h
1053MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/input.card
1054MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/lagrange.h
1055MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/parms.c
1056MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/parms.h
1057MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/ph2cph.c
1058MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/refl-install
1059MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/reflector.c
1060MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/version.h
1061
1062MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/Tdas0211.ps.gz
1063MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/Tdas0211.tex
1064MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/magic-tdas.sty
1065MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/magiclogo.eps
1066MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/colimation.eps.gz
1067MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/coma.eps.gz
1068MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/coma_star.eps.gz
1069MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/coorsystems.eps.gz
1070MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/evcompare.eps.gz
1071MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/parabola.eps.gz
1072MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/refl06images.eps.gz
1073MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/spot10kmf1694.eps.gz
1074MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/spot10kmf1700.eps.gz
1075MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/spot_inf_f1697.eps.gz
1076MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/telecoor.eps.gz
1077MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/doc/eps/timing.eps.gz
1078
1079MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/tester/Makefile
1080MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Reflector_0.6/tester/cermaker.c
1081
1082MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Data/axisdev.dat
1083MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Data/magic.def
1084MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/Data/reflectivity.dat
1085
1086MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/lib/libranlib.a.osf1
1087MagicProgs/Simulation/Detector/lib/libranlib.a.linux
1088
1089\end{verbatim}
1090
1091%%% BIBLIOGRAPHY %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1092
1093%%>>>> Use the following if you are using BibTeX for bibliography
1094%\theBibliography
1095
1096%%>>>> Or the following if you include here by hand your
1097%%>>>> bibliographic entries
1098
1099\end{document}
1100%
1101%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1102%%% Upper-case A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
1103%%% Lower-case a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
1104%%% Digits 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1105%%% Exclamation ! Double quote " Hash (number) #
1106%%% Dollar $ Percent % Ampersand &
1107%%% Acute accent ' Left paren ( Right paren )
1108%%% Asterisk * Plus + Comma ,
1109%%% Minus - Point . Solidus /
1110%%% Colon : Semicolon ; Less than <
1111%%% Equals = Greater than > Question mark ?
1112%%% At @ Left bracket [ Backslash \
1113%%% Right bracket ] Circumflex ^ Underscore _
1114%%% Grave accent ` Left brace { Vertical bar |
1115%%% Right brace } Tilde ~
1116%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1117%% Local Variables:
1118%% mode:latex
1119%% mode:font-lock
1120%% mode:auto-fill
1121%% time-stamp-line-limit:100
1122%% End:
1123%% EOF
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.