source: trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/MAGIC_signal_reco.tex@ 6657

Last change on this file since 6657 was 6657, checked in by gaug, 20 years ago
*** empty log message ***
File size: 2.7 KB
Line 
1\documentclass[12pt]{article}
2\usepackage{magic-tdas}
3
4
5\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
6
7\usepackage{amsmath}
8\usepackage{amssymb}
9
10\usepackage{amsthm}
11\usepackage{color}
12
13\usepackage{graphicx}
14\usepackage{caption2}
15
16%\usepackage{citesort}
17\usepackage{url}
18\usepackage{mdwlist}
19\usepackage{lscape}
20
21\setlength{\parindent}{0cm}
22
23\sloppy
24
25\renewcommand{\captionfont}{\small\slshape}
26\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}
27\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.0}
28
29\begin{document}
30
31
32
33%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
34%% Please, for the formatting just include here the standard
35%% elements: title, author, date, plus TDAScode
36%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37\title{Comparison of Signal Reconstruction Algorithms for the MAGIC Telescope}
38\author{H. Bartko, M. Gaug, F. Goebel, A. Moralejo,\\
39Th. Schweizer, M. Shayduk, N. Sidro, W. Wittek}
40\date{February 21$^{\mathrm{st}}$, 2005\\}
41\TDAScode{MAGIC-TDAS 05-xx\\ 050221}
42%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
43
44%% title %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45\maketitle
46
47%% abstract %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48\begin{abstract}
49Presently, the MAGIC telescope uses a 300~MHz FADC system to sample the transmitted and shaped signals from
50the captured Cherenkov light of air showers.
51In this note. different algorithms to reconstruct the signal from the read out samples
52are described and compared. Criteria for comparison are defined and used to judge the
53different extractors applied to calibration signals, cosmics and pedestals. At the end,
54extractors are recommended for the most conservative and the most advanced and demanding analyses.
55It is shown that the digital filter
56can be used to extract and fit single photo-electron pulses from the night sky background.
57The achievable time resolution can be parameterized to be:
58\begin{equation}
59\Delta T_{\mathrm{cosmics}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{(2\,\mathrm{ns})^2}{<Q>/{\mathrm{phe}}}
60+ \frac{(4.5\,\mathrm{ns})^2}{<Q>^2/{\mathrm{phe^2}}} + (0.2\,\mathrm{ns})^2} . \nonumber
61\label{eq:time:fitprediction}
62\end{equation}
63For galactic backgrounds an image cleaning threshold as low as 5~photo-electrons can be achieved
64for rejecting 99.7\% of noise.
65\end{abstract}
66
67%% contents %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
68\newpage
69\tableofcontents
70
71%% body %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72%\include{pedplots}
73\include{Introduction}
74\include{Reconstruction}
75\include{Algorithms}
76\include{Criteria}
77\include{Pedestal}
78\include{Calibration}
79\include{Pulpo}
80\include{MonteCarlo}
81\include{Speed}
82\include{Results}
83\include{Conclusions}
84%\include{pheplots}
85
86\bibliography{bibfile}
87\bibliographystyle{bibstyle}
88
89\end{document}
90
91
92
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.