Changeset 5566


Ignore:
Timestamp:
12/07/04 20:48:41 (20 years ago)
Author:
hbartko
Message:
*** empty log message ***
Location:
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor
Files:
3 added
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Changelog

    r5543 r5566  
    1919
    2020                                                 -*-*- END OF LINE -*-*-
     212004/11/10: Hendrik Bartko
     22  * Reconstruction.tex: Added some paragraphs how we reconstruct the
     23    average pulse shape from the recorded signal samples. Added some
     24    plots with reconstructed pulse shapes.
    2125
    22262004/12/01: Markus Gaug
  • trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Reconstruction.tex

    r5244 r5566  
    11\section{Pulse Shape Reconstruction}
     2
     3The clock of the FADC read-out is not synchronized with the trigger. Therefore the relative position of the recorded signal samples with respect to the position of the signal shape varies event by event. The time between the trigger decision and the first read-out sample is equally distributed in the range
     4$t_{\text{rel}} \in [0,3.33[$ ns and can be determined directly by a
     5time to digital converter (TDC) or using the reconstructed arrival time $t_{\mathrm{arrival}}$.
     6
     7The asynchronous sampling of the pulse shape allows to determine an average pulse shape from the recorded signal samples: The recorded signal samples are shifted in time such that the shifted arrival times of all events are equal. In addition the signal samples are normalized event by event using the reconstructed charge of the pulse.
     8
     9The accuracy of the signal shape reconstruction depends on the accuracy of the arrival time and the signal charge reconstruction.
     10
     11Figures \ref{fig:pulpo_shape_high} and \ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low} show the average normalized reconstructed pulse shapes for pulse generator pulses (pulpo setup) in the high and in the low gain, respectively. The input FWHM of the pulse generator pulses is about 2 ns. The FWHM of the average reconstructed high gain pulse shape is about 6.3 ns while the FWHM of the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is about 10 ns. The pulse broadening of the low gain with respect to the high gain is due to the 50 ns on board delay line of the MAGIC receiver boards.
     12
     13
     14\begin{figure}[h!]
     15\begin{center}
     16\includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{pulpo_shape_high.eps}
     17\end{center}
     18\caption[Reconstructed high gain shape.]{Average reconstructed high gain pulse shape from a pulpo run. The FWHM is about 6.2 ns.} \label{fig:pulpo_shape_high}
     19\end{figure}
     20
     21\begin{figure}[h!]
     22\begin{center}
     23\includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{pulpo_shape_low.eps}
     24\end{center}
     25\caption[Reconstructed pulpo low gain shape.]{Average reconstructed high gain pulse shape from a pulpo run. The FWHM is about 10 ns.} \label{fig:pulpo_shape_low}
     26\end{figure}
     27
     28Figure \ref{fig:shape_green_high} shows the average reconstructed pulse shape for green calibration LED pulses. The pulses shape has a FWHM of about 6.5 ns and a significant tail.
     29
     30
     31\begin{figure}[h!]
     32\begin{center}
     33\includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{shape_green_high.eps}
     34\end{center}
     35\caption[Reconstructed green calibration high gain shape.]{Average reconstructed high gain pulse shape for one green LED calibration run. The FWHM is about 6.5 ns.} \label{fig:shape_green_high}
     36\end{figure}
     37
     38
    239
    340\begin{itemize}
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.