Changeset 5716
- Timestamp:
- 01/07/05 13:04:32 (20 years ago)
- Location:
- trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor
- Files:
-
- 4 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Algorithms.tex
r5709 r5716 13 13 } 14 14 15 \subsection{Pure signal extractors}15 \subsection{Pure Signal Extractors} 16 16 17 17 The pure signal extractors have in common that they compute only the … … 36 36 As it does not correct for the clock-noise, only an even number of samples is allowed. 37 37 38 \subsubsection{Fixed Window with global Peak Search}38 \subsubsection{Fixed Window with Global Peak Search} 39 39 40 40 This extractor is implemented in the MARS-class {\textit{MExtractFixedWindowPeakSearch}}. … … 58 58 \end{description} 59 59 60 \subsubsection{Fixed Window with integrated cubic spline}60 \subsubsection{Fixed Window with Integrated Cubic Spline} 61 61 62 62 This extractor is implemented in the MARS-class {\textit{MExtractFixedWindowSpline}}. … … 66 66 As it does not correct for the clock-noise, only an odd number of samples is allowed. 67 67 68 \subsection{Combined extractors}68 \subsection{Combined Extractors} 69 69 70 70 The combined extractors have in common that they compute the arrival time and … … 101 101 be chosen} \ldots 102 102 103 \subsubsection{Sliding Window with amplitude-weighted time}103 \subsubsection{Sliding Window with Amplitude-Weighted Time} 104 104 105 105 This extractor is implemented in the MARS-class {\textit{MExtractTimeAndChargeSlidingWindow}}. … … 123 123 \end{description} 124 124 125 \subsubsection{Cubic Spline with Sliding Window or Amplitude extraction}125 \subsubsection{Cubic Spline with Sliding Window or Amplitude Extraction} 126 126 127 127 This extractor is implemented in the MARS-class {\textit{MExtractTimeAndChargeSpline}}. … … 369 369 \end{description} 370 370 371 \subsubsection{Real fit to the expected pulse shape }371 \subsubsection{Real Fit to the Expected Pulse Shape } 372 372 373 373 This extractor is not yet implemented as MARS-class... -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Changelog
r5708 r5716 29 29 2004/01/05: Markus Gaug 30 30 * Introduction.tex: Some changes in style 31 * Algorithms.tex: Fixed section headers 32 * Reconstruction.tex: text updated 31 33 32 34 2005/01/04: Hendrik Bartko -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Pedestal.tex
r5698 r5716 1 \section{Criteria for an optimal pedestal extraction}1 \section{Criteria for an Pptimal Pedestal Extraction} 2 2 3 3 \ldots {\it In this section, the distinction is made between: … … 101 101 where $c$ is the photon/ADC conversion factor $<ST>/<m_{pe}>$. 102 102 103 \subsection{How to retrieve Bias $B$ and Error $R$}103 \subsection{How to Retrieve Bias $B$ and Error $R$} 104 104 105 105 $R$ is in general different from the pedestal RMS. It cannot be … … 130 130 \end{enumerate} 131 131 132 \subsubsection{ \label{sec:determiner} Determine error $R$ by applying the signal extractor to a fixed window133 of pedestal events}132 \subsubsection{ \label{sec:determiner} Determine Error $R$ by Applying the Signal Extractor to a Fixed Window 133 of Pedestal Events} 134 134 135 135 By applying the signal extractor to a fixed window of pedestal events, we -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Reconstruction.tex
r5707 r5716 30 30 31 31 Clearly visible are the high and the low gain pulses. The low gain 32 pulse is attenuated by a factor of about 10 and delayed by about 5 0ns with respect to the high gain pulse.32 pulse is attenuated by a factor of about 10 and delayed by about 55\,ns with respect to the high gain pulse. 33 33 34 Figures~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low} show the average normalized reconstructed pulse shapes for pulse generator pulses (pulpo setup) in the high and in the low gain, respectively. The input FWHM of the pulse generator pulses is about 2 ns. The FWHM of the average reconstructed high gain pulse shape is about 6.3 ns, while the FWHM of the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is about 10 ns. The pulse broadening of the low gain pulses with respect to the high gain pulses is due to the electric 50 ns on board delay line of the MAGIC receiver boards. % while the FWHM of the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is 34 Figures~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low} shows the averaged normalized reconstructed pulse shapes for the ``pulpo'' 35 pulses in the high and in the low gain, respectively. The input FWHM of the pulse generator pulses is 36 about 2\,ns. The FWHM of the average reconstructed high gain pulse shape is about 6.3\,ns, while the FWHM of 37 the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is about 10\,ns. The pulse broadening of the low gain pulses 38 with respect to the high gain pulses is due to the limited dynamic range of the passive 55\,ns on board 39 delay line of the MAGIC receiver boards. 40 % while the FWHM of the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is 35 41 % Due to the electric delay line for the low gain pules on the receiver board the low gain pulse is widened with respect to the high gain. It has a FWHM of about 10 ns. 36 42 … … 80 86 %%% mode: latex 81 87 %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" 82 %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco"83 88 %%% End:
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.