Index: /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Algorithms.tex =================================================================== --- /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Algorithms.tex (revision 5715) +++ /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Algorithms.tex (revision 5716) @@ -13,5 +13,5 @@ } -\subsection{Pure signal extractors} +\subsection{Pure Signal Extractors} The pure signal extractors have in common that they compute only the @@ -36,5 +36,5 @@ As it does not correct for the clock-noise, only an even number of samples is allowed. -\subsubsection{Fixed Window with global Peak Search} +\subsubsection{Fixed Window with Global Peak Search} This extractor is implemented in the MARS-class {\textit{MExtractFixedWindowPeakSearch}}. @@ -58,5 +58,5 @@ \end{description} -\subsubsection{Fixed Window with integrated cubic spline} +\subsubsection{Fixed Window with Integrated Cubic Spline} This extractor is implemented in the MARS-class {\textit{MExtractFixedWindowSpline}}. @@ -66,5 +66,5 @@ As it does not correct for the clock-noise, only an odd number of samples is allowed. -\subsection{Combined extractors} +\subsection{Combined Extractors} The combined extractors have in common that they compute the arrival time and @@ -101,5 +101,5 @@ be chosen} \ldots -\subsubsection{Sliding Window with amplitude-weighted time} +\subsubsection{Sliding Window with Amplitude-Weighted Time} This extractor is implemented in the MARS-class {\textit{MExtractTimeAndChargeSlidingWindow}}. @@ -123,5 +123,5 @@ \end{description} -\subsubsection{Cubic Spline with Sliding Window or Amplitude extraction} +\subsubsection{Cubic Spline with Sliding Window or Amplitude Extraction} This extractor is implemented in the MARS-class {\textit{MExtractTimeAndChargeSpline}}. @@ -369,5 +369,5 @@ \end{description} -\subsubsection{Real fit to the expected pulse shape } +\subsubsection{Real Fit to the Expected Pulse Shape } This extractor is not yet implemented as MARS-class... Index: /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Changelog =================================================================== --- /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Changelog (revision 5715) +++ /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Changelog (revision 5716) @@ -29,4 +29,6 @@ 2004/01/05: Markus Gaug * Introduction.tex: Some changes in style + * Algorithms.tex: Fixed section headers + * Reconstruction.tex: text updated 2005/01/04: Hendrik Bartko Index: /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Pedestal.tex =================================================================== --- /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Pedestal.tex (revision 5715) +++ /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Pedestal.tex (revision 5716) @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -\section{Criteria for an optimal pedestal extraction} +\section{Criteria for an Pptimal Pedestal Extraction} \ldots {\it In this section, the distinction is made between: @@ -101,5 +101,5 @@ where $c$ is the photon/ADC conversion factor $/$. -\subsection{How to retrieve Bias $B$ and Error $R$} +\subsection{How to Retrieve Bias $B$ and Error $R$} $R$ is in general different from the pedestal RMS. It cannot be @@ -130,6 +130,6 @@ \end{enumerate} -\subsubsection{ \label{sec:determiner} Determine error $R$ by applying the signal extractor to a fixed window -of pedestal events} +\subsubsection{ \label{sec:determiner} Determine Error $R$ by Applying the Signal Extractor to a Fixed Window +of Pedestal Events} By applying the signal extractor to a fixed window of pedestal events, we Index: /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Reconstruction.tex =================================================================== --- /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Reconstruction.tex (revision 5715) +++ /trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Reconstruction.tex (revision 5716) @@ -30,7 +30,13 @@ Clearly visible are the high and the low gain pulses. The low gain -pulse is attenuated by a factor of about 10 and delayed by about 50 ns with respect to the high gain pulse. +pulse is attenuated by a factor of about 10 and delayed by about 55\,ns with respect to the high gain pulse. -Figures~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low} show the average normalized reconstructed pulse shapes for pulse generator pulses (pulpo setup) in the high and in the low gain, respectively. The input FWHM of the pulse generator pulses is about 2 ns. The FWHM of the average reconstructed high gain pulse shape is about 6.3 ns, while the FWHM of the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is about 10 ns. The pulse broadening of the low gain pulses with respect to the high gain pulses is due to the electric 50 ns on board delay line of the MAGIC receiver boards. % while the FWHM of the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is +Figures~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low} shows the averaged normalized reconstructed pulse shapes for the ``pulpo'' +pulses in the high and in the low gain, respectively. The input FWHM of the pulse generator pulses is +about 2\,ns. The FWHM of the average reconstructed high gain pulse shape is about 6.3\,ns, while the FWHM of +the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is about 10\,ns. The pulse broadening of the low gain pulses +with respect to the high gain pulses is due to the limited dynamic range of the passive 55\,ns on board +delay line of the MAGIC receiver boards. +% while the FWHM of the average reconstructed low gain pulse shape is % Due to the electric delay line for the low gain pules on the receiver board the low gain pulse is widened with respect to the high gain. It has a FWHM of about 10 ns. @@ -80,4 +86,3 @@ %%% mode: latex %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" -%%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" %%% End: