Changeset 5718 for trunk/MagicSoft

Timestamp:

01/07/05 13:06:51 (20 years ago)

Author:

gaug

Message:

*** empty log message ***

Location:

trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor

Files:

• Criteria.tex (modified) (2 diffs)
• Pedestal.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• Performance.tex (modified) (4 diffs)

trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Criteria.tex

@@ -35 +35 @@
 \ldots {\textit In this section, the Nuria plots are examined \newline \ldots Nuria}
 
-\subsection{Treatment of calibration pulses}
+\subsection{Treatment of Calibration Pulses}
 \ldots {\textit In this section, the question of the different pulse shapes between calibration pulses, its 
 secondary pulses, possible secondary pulses from hadronic showers and the typical Cherenkov 
@@ -42 +42 @@
 \newline \ldots Hendrik??? , Markus???  + ????}
 
-\subsection{Low gain extraction}
+\subsection{Low Gain Extraction}
 \ldots {\textit In this section, the stability of the low-gain extraction w.r.t. the high-gain extraction is 
 examined. Useful plots are still to be defined.
 \newline \ldots Arnau ????}
 
-\subsection{Applicability for different sampling speeds / no pulse shaping.}
+\subsection{Applicability for Different Sampling Speeds / No Pulse Shaping.}
 \ldots {\textit In this section, some comments of Hendrik will be made}
 
-\subsection{CPU requirements}
+\subsection{CPU Requirements}
 \ldots {\textit In this section, the needed CPU time is measured for each extractor independently }
 \newline \ldots {\textit ALL (after all)}

trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Pedestal.tex

@@ -1 @@
-\section{Criteria for an Pptimal Pedestal Extraction}
+\section{Criteria for an Optimal Pedestal Extraction}
 
 \ldots {\it In this section, the distinction is made between: 

trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Performance.tex

@@ -96 +96 @@
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
-\subsubsection{Un-calibrated pixels and events}
+\subsubsection{Un-Calibrated Pixels and Events}
 
 The MAGIC calibration software incorporates a series of checks to sort out mal-functionning pixels. 
@@ -219 +219 @@
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
-\subsubsection{Number of photo-electrons}
+\subsubsection{Number of Photo-Electrons}
 
 Assuming that the readout chain is clean and adds only negligible noise with respect to the one 
@@ -356 +356 @@
 
 
-\subsubsection{Linearity tests}
+\subsubsection{Linearity Tests}
 
 In this section, we test the lineary of the extractors. As the photo-multiplier is a linear device over a 
@@ -438 +438 @@
 
 
-\subsubsection{Time resolution}
+\subsubsection{Time Resolution}
 
 The extractors \#17--32 are able to extract also the arrival time of each pulse. In the calibration,