- Timestamp:
- 02/04/05 14:50:47 (20 years ago)
- Location:
- trunk/MagicSoft/GRB-Proposal
- Files:
-
- 2 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/MagicSoft/GRB-Proposal/Strategies.tex
r6255 r6256 48 48 overlap with $F_{overlap}(SWIFT) = 1$ yielding $N_{obs}^{max} \sim 1.6$/month. 49 49 50 \subsection{GRB observations in case of moon shine} 50 \subsection{Determine the Maximum Zenith Angle} 51 52 We determine the maximum zenith angle for GRB observations by requiring that the overwhelming 53 majority of possible GRBs will have an in principle observable spectrum. Figure~\ref{fig:grh} 54 shows the gamma-ray horizon (GRH) as computed in~\cite{KNEISKE,SALOMON}. The GRH is defined as the 55 gamma-ray energy at which a part of $1/e$ of a hypothetical mono-energetic flux gets absorbed after 56 travelling a distance, expressed in redshift $z$, from the source. One can see that at typical 57 GRB distances of $z=1$, all gamma-rays above 100\,GeV get absorbed before they can reach the earth. 58 59 \par 60 61 Even the closest GRB with known redshift ever observed, GRB030329~\cite{GRB030329}, lies at a redshift 62 of $z=0.1685$. In this case $\gamma$-rays above 200\,GeV get entirely absorbed. 63 64 \begin{figure}[htp] 65 \centering 66 \includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{f4.eps} 67 \caption{Gamma Ray Horizon as derived in~\cite{KNEISKE}} 68 \label{fig:grh} 69 \end{figure} 70 71 \par 72 73 We assume now a current energy threshold of 50\,GeV for \ma at a zenith angle of 74 $\theta = 0$\footnote{As this proposal is going to be reviewed in a couple of months, improvements of the energy threshold will be taken into account then.}. According to~\cite{ecl}, the energy threshold of a Cherenkov telescope scales with zenith angle like: 75 76 \begin{equation} 77 E_{thr}(\theta) = E_{thr}(0) \cdot \cos(\theta)^{-2.7} 78 \label{eq:ethrvszenith} 79 \end{equation} 80 81 Eq.~\ref{eq:ethrvszenith} leads to an energy threshold of about 5.6\,TeV at $\theta = 80^\circ$, 82 900\,GeV at $\theta = 70^\circ$ and 500\,GeV at $\theta = 65^\circ$. 83 Inserting these results into the GRH (figure~\ref{fig:grh}), one gets a maximal observable GRB 84 distance of $z = 0.1$ at $\theta = 70^\circ$ and $z = 0.2$ at $\theta = 65^\circ$. 85 We think that the probability for GRBs to occur at these distances is sufficiently small in order to 86 neglect the very difficult observations beyond these limits. 87 88 \subsection{GRB Observations in Case of Moon Shine} 51 89 52 90 {\it gspot} allows only GRBs with an angular distance of $> 30^\circ$ from the moon. … … 80 118 $\theta_{max} = 70^\circ$ to $\theta_{max} = 65^\circ$, there. 81 119 82 \subsection{Active Mirror Control behaviour}120 \subsection{Active Mirror Control Behaviour} 83 121 84 122 To reduce the time before the start of the observation, the use of the look-up tables (LUTs) is necessary. … … 98 136 We would like to continue taking the interlaced calibration events when a GRB alert is launched, but leave out the pedestal and calibration run in order not to loose valuable time. 99 137 100 \subsection{Determine the maximum zenith angle} 101 102 We determine the maximum zenith angle for GRB observations by requiring that the overwhelming majority of possible GRBs will have an in principle observable spectrum. Figure~\ref{fig:grh} 103 shows the gamma-ray horizon (GRH) as computed in~\cite{KNEISKE,SALOMON}. The GRH is defined as the 104 gamma-ray energy at which a part of $1/e$ of a hypothetical mono-energetic flux gets absorbed after 105 travelling a distance, expressed in redshift $z$, from the source. One can see that at typical 106 GRB distances of $z=1$, all gamma-rays above 100\,GeV get absorbed before they can reach the earth. 107 108 \par 109 110 Even the closest GRB with known redshift ever observed, GRB030329~\cite{GRB030329}, lies at a redshift 111 of $z=0.1685$. In this case $\gamma$-rays above 200\,GeV get entirely absorbed. 112 113 \begin{figure}[htp] 114 \centering 115 \includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{f4.eps} 116 \caption{Gamma Ray Horizon as derived in~\cite{KNEISKE}} 117 \label{fig:grh} 118 \end{figure} 119 120 \par 121 122 We assume now a current energy threshold of 50\,GeV for \ma at a zenith angle of 123 $\theta = 0$\footnote{As this proposal is going to be reviewed in a couple of months, improvements of the energy threshold will be taken into account then.}. According to~\cite{ecl}, the energy threshold of a Cherenkov telescope scales with zenith angle like: 124 125 \begin{equation} 126 E_{thr}(\theta) = E_{thr}(0) \cdot \cos(\theta)^{-2.7} 127 \label{eq:ethrvszenith} 128 \end{equation} 129 130 Eq.~\ref{eq:ethrvszenith} leads to an energy threshold of about 5.6\,TeV at $\theta = 80^\circ$, 131 900\,GeV at $\theta = 70^\circ$ and 500\,GeV at $\theta = 65^\circ$. 132 Inserting these results into the GRH (figure~\ref{fig:grh}), one gets a maximal observable GRB distance of $z = 0.1$ at $\theta = 70^\circ$ and $z = 0.2$ at $\theta = 65^\circ$. 133 We think that the probability for GRBs to occur at these distances is sufficiently small in order to neglect the very difficult observations beyond these limits. 134 135 \subsection{In case of follow-up: Next steps} 138 \subsection{In case of Follow-up: Next Steps} 136 139 137 140 We propose to analyze the GRB data at the following day in order to tell whether a follow-up observation during the next night is useful. We think that a limit of 3\,$\sigma$ significance should be enough to start such a follow-up observation of the same place. This follow-up observation can then be used in two ways: -
trunk/MagicSoft/GRB-Proposal/make_ps.sh
r5967 r6256 2 2 3 3 rm GRB_proposal_2005.aux 4 #latex GRB_proposal_2005.tex4 latex GRB_proposal_2005.tex 5 5 #bibtex GRB_proposal_2005 6 6 latex GRB_proposal_2005.tex
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.