Changeset 6430
- Timestamp:
- 02/13/05 15:34:06 (20 years ago)
- Location:
- trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor
- Files:
-
- 2 added
- 2 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Changelog
r6419 r6430 19 19 20 20 -*-*- END OF LINE -*-*- 21 2004/02/13: Hendrik Bartko 22 * Reconstruction.tex: updated+new figures 23 * Algorithms.tex: updated 24 * shape_25945_raw.eps: new figure 25 * time_25945.eps: new figure 26 21 27 22 28 2004/02/10: Markus Gaug -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Reconstruction.tex
r6112 r6430 7 7 It can be determined using the reconstructed arrival time 8 8 $t_{\mathrm{arrival}}$.%directly by a time to digital converter (TDC) or 9 \par 10 \ldots {\textit{MAYBE a PLOT TO DEMONSTRATE THIS?}} 11 \par 9 10 \begin{figure}[h!] 11 \begin{center} 12 \includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{shape_25945_raw.eps} 13 \end{center} 14 \caption[Raw shape.]{Raw FADC samples of 1000 pulse generator pulses overlayed.} 15 \label{fig:raw_shape} 16 \end{figure} 17 18 \begin{figure}[h!] 19 \begin{center} 20 \includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{time_25945.eps} 21 \end{center} 22 \caption[Reconstructed time.]{Distribution of the reconstructed time from the raw FADC samples shown in figure \ref{fig:raw_shape}. The width of the distribution is due to the trigger jitter of 1 FADC period (3.33 ns).} 23 \label{fig:reco_time} 24 \end{figure} 25 26 12 27 The asynchronous sampling of the pulse shape allows to determine an average pulse shape from the recorded 13 28 signal samples: The recorded signal samples can be shifted in time such that the shifted arrival times 14 29 of all events are equal. In addition, the signal samples are normalized event by event using the 15 30 reconstructed charge of the pulse. The accuracy of the signal shape reconstruction depends on the accuracy 16 of the arrival time and charge reconstruction and amounts to \ldots 17 18 \par 19 {\textit{NUMBER IS MISSING !!}} 20 \par 21 \ldots 22 23 Figure~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_high} shows the averaged and shifted reconstructed signal of a fast pulser 24 in the so called pulse generator (``pulpo'') setup. 25 26 \ldots 27 \par 28 {\textit{EXPLAIN PULPO SETUO}} 29 \par 30 \ldots 31 of the arrival time and charge reconstruction. The statistical error of the reconstructed pulse shape is well below $10^{-2}$ while the systematical error is by definition unknown at first hand. 31 32 32 33 33 Clearly visible are the high and the low gain pulses. The low gain 34 pulse is attenuated by a factor of about 10 and delayed by about 55\,ns with respect to the high gain pulse. 34 \begin{figure}[h!] 35 \begin{center} 36 \includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{pulpo_shape_high_low_TDAS.eps}%{pulpo_shape_high.eps} 37 \end{center} 38 \caption[Reconstructed high gain shape.]{Average reconstructed pulse shape from a pulpo run showing the highgain and the low gain pulse. The FWHM of the high gain pulse is about 6.2 ns while the FWHM of the low gain pulse is about 10ns.} 39 \label{fig:pulpo_shape_high} 40 \end{figure} 35 41 36 Figures~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low} shows the averaged normalized reconstructed pulse shapes for the ``pulpo'' 42 43 Figure~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_high} shows the averaged and shifted reconstructed signal of a fast pulser in the so called pulse generator (``pulpo'') setup. Thereby 44 the response of the photomultipliers to Cherenkov light is simulated by a fast electrical pulse generator which generates unipolar pulses of about 2.5 ns FWHM and preset amplitude. These electrical pulses are transmitted using the same analog-optical link as the PMT pulses and are fed to the MAGIC receiver board. The pulse generator setup is mainly used for test purposes of the receiver board, trigger logic and FADCs. 45 46 47 In figure~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_high} the high and the low gain pulses are clearly visible. The low gain pulse is attenuated by a factor of about 10 and delayed by about 55\,ns with respect to the high gain pulse. 48 49 Figure~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low} shows the averaged normalized (to an area of 1FADC count * $T_{FADC}=3.33$ ns) reconstructed pulse shapes for the ``pulpo'' 37 50 pulses in the high and in the low gain, respectively. The input FWHM of the pulse generator pulses is 38 51 about 2\,ns. The FWHM of the average reconstructed high gain pulse shape is about 6.3\,ns, while the FWHM of … … 44 57 It has a FWHM of about 10 ns. 45 58 46 47 \begin{figure}[h!]48 \begin{center}49 \includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{pulpo_shape_high_low_TDAS.eps}%{pulpo_shape_high.eps}50 \end{center}51 \caption[Reconstructed high gain shape.]{Average reconstructed high gain pulse shape from a pulpo run. The FWHM is about 6.2 ns.}52 \label{fig:pulpo_shape_high}53 \end{figure}54 59 55 60 \begin{figure}[h!]
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.