Changeset 6462 for trunk/MagicSoft
- Timestamp:
- 02/14/05 17:44:42 (20 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Algorithms.tex
r6437 r6462 520 520 depend on the pulse shape, the derivative of the pulse shape and the noise autocorrelation. 521 521 In the high gain samples, the correlated night sky background noise dominates over 522 the white electronics noise. Thus, different noise levels just cause the members of the noise autocorrelation522 the white electronics noise. Thus, different noise levels just cause the elements of the noise autocorrelation 523 523 matrix to change by a same factor, 524 524 which cancels out in the weights calculation. … … 526 526 sky background noise level in the high gain. 527 527 528 Contrary to that in the low gain samples ... . 529 \ldots 530 \ldots {\textit{\bf SITUATION FOR LOW-GAIN SAMPLES! }} \ldots 531 \par 528 Contrary to that in the low gain samples the correlated noise from the LONS is in the same order of magnitude as the white electronics and digitization noise. Moreover the noise autocorrelation for the low gain samples can not directly be determined from the data. The low gain is only switched on if the pulse exceeds a presets threshold. There are no pedestals in the low gain available. Thus the noise auto-correlation determined from MC simulations for an extragalactic background is also used to compute the weights for cosmics and calibration pulses. 529 530 532 531 533 532 … … 559 558 \end{figure} 560 559 561 Using the average reconstructed pulpo pulse shape, as shown in figure \ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low}, and the 562 reconstructed noise autocorrelation matrix from a pedestal run 563 564 \par 565 \ldots {\textit{\bf WHICH RUN (RUN NUMBER, WHICH NSB?, WHICH PIXELS ??}} \ldots 566 \par 567 568 with random triggers, the digital filter 569 weights are computed. Figures \ref{fig:w_time_MC_input_TDAS} and \ref{fig:w_amp_MC_input_TDAS} show the amplitude and timing weights for the MC pulse shape. The first weight $w_{\mathrm{amp/time}}(t_0)$ is plotted as a function of the relative time $t_{\text{rel}}$ the trigger and the 560 Using the average reconstructed pulpo pulse shapes, as shown in figure \ref{fig:pulpo_shape_low}, and the reconstructed noise autocorrelation matrices from a pedestal runs with random triggers, the digital filter weights are computed. As the pulse shapes in the high and low gain and for cosmics, calibration and pulpo events are somewhat different, dedicated digital filter weights are computed for these event classes. Also filter weights optimized for MC simulations are calculated. High/low gain filter weights are computed for the following event classes: 561 562 \begin{enumerate} 563 \item{cosmics weights: for cosmics events} 564 \item{calibration weights UV: for UV calibration pulses} 565 \item{calibration weights blue: for blue and green calibration pulses} 566 \item{MC weights: for MC simulations} 567 \item{pulpo weights: for pulpo runs.} 568 \end{enumerate} 569 570 571 \begin{table}[h]{\normalsize\center 572 \begin{tabular}{lllll} 573 \hline 574 & high gain shape & high gain noise & low gain shape & low gain noise 575 \\ cosmics & 25945 (pulpo) & 38995 (extragal.) & 44461 (pulpo) & MC low 576 \\ UV & 36040 (UV) & 38995 (extragal.) & 44461 (pulpo) & MC low 577 \\ blue & 31762 (blue) & 38995 (extragal.) & 31742 (blue) & MC low 578 \\ MC & MC & MC high & MC & MC low 579 \\ pulpo & 25945 (pulpo) & 38993 (no LONS) & 44461 (pulpo) & MC low 580 \\ 581 \hline 582 \end{tabular} 583 \caption{The used runs for the pulse shapes and noise auto-correlations for the digital filter weights of the different event types.}\label{table:weight_files}} 584 \end{table} 585 586 587 588 589 Figures \ref{fig:w_time_MC_input_TDAS} and \ref{fig:w_amp_MC_input_TDAS} show the amplitude and timing weights for the MC pulse shape. The first weight $w_{\mathrm{amp/time}}(t_0)$ is plotted as a function of the relative time $t_{\text{rel}}$ the trigger and the 570 590 FADC clock in the range $[-0.5,0.5[ \ T_{\text{ADC}}$, the second weight in the range $[0.5,1.5[ \ T_{\text{ADC}}$ and so on. A binning resolution 571 591 of $0.1\,T_{\text{ADC}}$ has been chosen.
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.