Changeset 6745 for trunk/MagicSoft
- Timestamp:
- 03/04/05 14:26:44 (20 years ago)
- Location:
- trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor
- Files:
-
- 6 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Conclusions.tex
r6659 r6745 1 \section{Conclusions }1 \section{Conclusions \label{sec:conclusion}} 2 2 3 3 In the past, many MAGIC analyses have been conducted using different signal extractors. … … 60 60 %%% mode: latex 61 61 %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" 62 %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" 62 63 %%% End: -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Criteria.tex
r6666 r6745 1 \section{Criteria for the Optimal Signal Extraction }1 \section{Criteria for the Optimal Signal Extraction \label{sec:criteria}} 2 2 3 3 The goal for the optimal signal reconstruction algorithm is to compute an unbiased estimate of the strength and arrival time of the -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Introduction.tex
r6648 r6745 2 2 3 3 4 The MAGIC telescope aims to study the gamma ray emission from high energy phenomena and the violent physics processes in the universe 4 The MAGIC telescope aims to study the gamma ray emission from high energy phenomena and the violent physics 5 processes in the universe 5 6 at the lowest energy threshold possible \cite{low_energy}. 6 7 7 Figure~\ref{fig:MAGIC_read-out_scheme} shows a sketch of the MAGIC read-out scheme, including the PMT camera, 8 the analog-optical link, the majority trigger logic and 9 FADCs. The used PMTs provide a very fast 8 Figure~\ref{fig:MAGIC_read-out_scheme} shows a sketch of the MAGIC read-out scheme, including the 9 photomultiplier tubes (PMT) camera, 10 the analog-optical link, the majority trigger logic and flash analog-to-digital converters (FADCs). 11 The used PMTs provide a very fast 10 12 response to the input light signal. The response of the PMTs to sub-ns input light pulses shows a FWHM of 11 1.0 - 1.2 ns and rise and fall times of 600 and 700 ps correspondingly \cite{Magic-PMT}. By modulating VCSEL 13 1.0 - 1.2 ns and rise and fall times of 600 and 700\,ps correspondingly~\cite{Magic-PMT}. By modulating 14 vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) 12 15 type laser diodes in amplitude, the fast analogue signals from the PMTs are transferred via 162\,m long, 13 16 50/125\,$\mu$m diameter optical fibers to the counting house \cite{MAGIC-analog-link-2}. After transforming the … … 25 28 \caption[Current MAGIC read-out scheme.]{Current MAGIC read-out scheme: the analog PMT signals are 26 29 transferred via an analog optical link to the counting house -- where after the trigger decision -- the signals 27 are digitized by a 300 MHz FADCs system and written to the hard disk of a DAQPC.}30 are digitized by a 300\,MHz FADCs system and written to the hard disk of a data acquisition PC.} 28 31 \label{fig:MAGIC_read-out_scheme} 29 32 \end{figure} … … 37 40 resolution of 8 bit only, the signals are split into two branches with gains differing by a factor 10. 38 41 One branch is delayed by 55\,ns and then both branches are multiplexed and consecutively read-out by one FADC. 39 Figure~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_high} shows a typical average of identical signals. A more detailed overview about the MAGIC read-out and DAQ system is given in \cite{Magic-DAQ}. 42 Figure~\ref{fig:pulpo_shape_high} shows a typical average of identical signals. 43 A more detailed overview about the MAGIC read-out and DAQ system is given in \cite{Magic-DAQ}. 40 44 % The maximum sustained trigger rate could be 1 kHz. The FADCs feature a FIFO memory which allows a significantly higher short-time rate. 41 45 % Obviously by doing this, more LONS is integrated and thus the performance of the telescope on the analysis level is degraded. 42 46 43 47 44 To reach the highest sensitivity and the lowest possible analysis energy threshold the recorded signals from Cherenkov light have to be accurately reconstructed. Therefore the highest possible signal to noise ratio, signal reconstruction resolution and a small bias are important. 48 To reach the highest sensitivity and the lowest possible analysis energy threshold the recorded signals from 49 Cherenkov light have to be accurately reconstructed. Therefore the highest possible signal to noise ratio, 50 signal reconstruction resolution and a small bias are important. 45 51 46 Monte Carlo (MC) based simulations predict different time structures for gamma and hadron induced shower images as well as for images of single muons. An accurate arrival time determination may therefore improve the separation power of gamma events from the background events. Moreover, the timing information may be used in the image cleaning to discriminate between pixels which signal belongs to the shower and pixels which are affected by randomly timed background noise. 52 Monte Carlo (MC) based simulations predict different time structures for gamma and hadron induced shower 53 images as well as for images of single muons. An accurate arrival time determination may therefore improve 54 the separation power of gamma events from the background events. Moreover, the timing information may be 55 used in the image cleaning to discriminate between pixels which signal belongs to the shower and pixels 56 which are affected by randomly timed background noise. 47 57 48 58 49 This note is structured as follows: In section 2 the average pulse shapes are reconstructed from the recorded FADC samples for calibration and cosmics pulses. These pulse shapes are compared with the pulse shape implemented in the MC. In section 3 different signal reconstruction algorithms and their implementation in the common MAGIC software framework MARS are reviewed. In section 4 criteria for an optimal signal reconstruction are developed. Thereafter the signal extraction algorithms under study are applied to pedestal, calibration and MC events in sections 5 to 7. The CPU requirements of the different algorithms are compared in section 8. Finally in section 9 the results are summarized and in section 10 a standard signal extraction algorithm for MAGIC is proposed. 59 This note is structured as follows: In section~\ref{sec:reco} the average pulse shapes are reconstructed 60 from the recorded 61 FADC samples for calibration and cosmics pulses. These pulse shapes are compared with the pulse shape 62 implemented in the Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation. 63 In section~\ref{sec:algorithms} different signal reconstruction algorithms and their implementation in 64 the common MAGIC software framework MARS are reviewed. In section~\ref{sec:criteria} criteria for an optimal 65 signal 66 reconstruction are developed. Thereafter the signal extraction algorithms under study are applied to 67 pedestal, calibration and MC events in sections~\ref{sec:pedestals} to~\ref{sec:mc}. 68 The CPU requirements of the different algorithms 69 are compared in section~\ref{sec:speed}. Finally in section~\ref{sec:results} the results are summarized 70 and in section~\ref{sec:conclusion} a standard signal extraction algorithm for MAGIC is proposed. 50 71 51 72 \subsection{Characteristics of the current read-out system} 52 73 53 The following intrinsic characteristics of the current read-out system affect especially the signal reconstruction: 74 The following intrinsic characteristics of the current read-out system affect especially the signal 75 reconstruction: 54 76 55 77 \begin{description} … … 77 99 %%% mode: latex 78 100 %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" 101 %%% TeX-master: "Introduction" 79 102 %%% End: 80 103 -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Reconstruction.tex
r6648 r6745 1 \section{Pulse Shape Reconstruction }1 \section{Pulse Shape Reconstruction \label{sec:reco}} 2 2 3 3 The FADC clock is not synchronized with the trigger. Therefore, the relative position of the recorded -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Results.tex
r6660 r6745 1 \section{Results }1 \section{Results \label{sec:results}} 2 2 3 3 Based on the previous investigations, we summarize the obtained results in table~\ref{tab:result}. The following criteria … … 61 61 4 & Fix Win. (8,8) & \no & \ok & \ok &\best& \no & \ok & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ 62 62 5 & Fix W. (14,10) & \no & \ok & \ok &\best& \no & \ok & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ 63 \hline 63 \hline 64 64 6 & FW. Spl. (4,4) & \ok & \no & \no & \no & \ok & \no & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ 65 65 7 & FW. Spl. (4,6) & \ok & \no & \no & \no & \ok & \no & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ … … 67 67 9 & FW. Spl. (8,8) & \no & \ok & \ok & \ok & \no & \ok & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ 68 68 10 & FW. Spl (14,10) & \no & \ok & \ok & \ok & \no & \ok & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ 69 \hline 69 \hline 70 70 11 & FW. Pk S. (2,2) & \no & \no & \no & \no & \no & \no & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ 71 71 12 & FW. Pk S. (4,4) & \ok & \no & \no & \no & \no & \no & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ … … 74 74 15 & FW. Pk S. (8,8) & \no & \ok & \ok & \ok & \no & \ok & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ 75 75 16 & FW Pk S (14,10) & \no & \ok & \ok & \ok & \no & \ok & -- & n/a & n/a & \ok \\ 76 \hline 76 \hline 77 77 17 & Slid. W. (2,2) & \ok & \no & \no & \no & \ok & \no & \ok & \no & \no & \ok \\ 78 78 18 & Slid. W. (4,4) & \ok & \ok & \ok & \no & \ok & \ok & \ok & \no & \no & \ok \\ … … 81 81 21 & Slid. W. (8,8) & \ok & \ok & \ok & \ok & \no & \ok & \ok & \ok & \ok &\best\\ 82 82 22 & Slid. W. (14,10) & \no & \ok & \ok & \ok & \no & \no & \ok & \no & \ok &\best\\ 83 \hline 83 \hline 84 84 23 & Spline Ampl. & \no &\nt & \ok & \no & \no & \no & \no &\ok & \no & \ok \\ 85 85 & & &\test& & & & & & & & \\ … … 110 110 %%% mode: latex 111 111 %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" 112 %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" 112 113 %%% End: -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Speed.tex
r6655 r6745 1 \section{CPU Requirements }1 \section{CPU Requirements \label{sec:speed}} 2 2 3 3 We tested the speed of the extractors by running them on an Intel\ Pentium\ IV, … … 68 68 \end{table} 69 69 70 71 %%% Local Variables: 72 %%% mode: latex 73 %%% TeX-master: "MAGIC_signal_reco" 74 %%% End:
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.