Changeset 6816 for trunk/MagicSoft/GRB-Proposal
- Timestamp:
- 03/11/05 08:42:58 (20 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/MagicSoft/GRB-Proposal/Monitor.tex
r6814 r6816 41 41 inner pixel of the \ma camera.\\ 42 42 43 In case of alert, {\it gspot} stores the informations and enters 43 In case of alert, {\it gspot} stores the informations and enters into 44 44 an {\bf Alarm State}. The duration of the alarm depends on the following parameters: 45 45 … … 54 54 distance from the GRB to the Moon has to be at least 30$^\circ$. This constant 55 55 value of 30$^\circ$ will change in the future as soon as the camera experts 56 will provide a plot of the safe distance from the Moon vs. Moon 'sphase.56 will provide a plot of the safe distance from the Moon vs. Moon phase. 57 57 Therefore such dynamical limit for this value will be used. 58 58 \end{itemize} … … 63 63 At the moment when the criteria listed above are fulfilled for this burst, and the time interval 64 64 after the burst onset is smaller than 5 hours, {\it gspot} enters into \textcolor{red}{\bf Red Alarm State}. 65 If all the mentioned conditions are satisfied from the beginning, {\it gspot} enters into Red Alarm State immediately. 66 If more than one alert is recived and the burst can not be observed immediately, the alert information are saved in a list. 65 If all the mentioned conditions are satisfied from the beginning, {\it gspot} enters 66 into \textcolor{red}{\bf Red Alarm State} immediately. 67 If more than one alert is recived and the burst cannot be observed immediately, 68 the alert information are saved in a list. 67 69 The software weights the alerts according the total amount of time in which 68 the GRB will be observable, the delay from the onset of GRB 'sobservability,69 the intensisty of the burst and the mean GRB 'szenith angle during its70 the GRB will be observable, the delay from the onset of GRB observability, 71 the intensisty of the burst and the mean GRB zenith angle during its 70 72 period of observability. 71 73 The best candidate is sent to the CC as soon as {\it gspot} 72 enters the \textcolor{red}{\bf Red Alarm state}, i.e. as soon as such74 enters into the \textcolor{red}{\bf Red Alarm state}, i.e. as soon as such 73 75 candidate becomes observable.\\ 74 76 … … 76 78 if the communication with the CC is available then {\it gspot} sends to it 77 79 the GRB equatorial coordinates (RA/DEC J2000). 78 For the communication with CC theformat defined in~\cite{CONTROL} is used.79 At the same time, theshifters and the GRB-MAGIC group are contacted.80 For the communication with CC, format defined in~\cite{CONTROL} is used. 81 At the same time, shifters and the GRB-MAGIC group are contacted. 80 82 81 83 \subsection{The Interface to the Central Control} … … 90 92 \begin{itemize} 91 93 \item {\it gspot} receives from the CC the confirmation 92 that the alert notice has been received ( theCC must send back the alert in order93 to perform a cross-check of therelevant data);94 that the alert notice has been received (CC must send back the alert in order 95 to perform a cross-check of relevant data); 94 96 \item the \textcolor{red}{\bf RED Alarm state} expires because of the 95 97 missing of one or more of the needed criteria mentioned above; … … 106 108 \subsection{GRB Archive and Emails to the GRB-mailing List} 107 109 108 In case of alert -- even if it d idnot contain the necessary coordinates -- the110 In case of alert -- even if it does not contain the necessary coordinates -- the 109 111 information is translated into ``human language'' and stored in ASCII files. 110 112 At the same time, an e-mail is sent to the MAGIC GRB-mailing list … … 136 138 Since July 15$^{\mathrm{th}}$, 2004, {\it gspot} has been working stably at La Palma. 137 139 It received about 100 alerts from HETE-2 and INTEGRAL, out of which 138 19 contained GRB 'scoordinates. Time delays to the onset of the burst140 19 contained GRB coordinates. Time delays to the onset of the burst 139 141 were of the order of several minutes to tens of minutes. The Burst Monitor can be considered stable 140 since November 2004. Since th enwe have received the following four significant alerts:\\142 since November 2004. Since that date we have received the following four significant alerts:\\ 141 143 142 144 \begin{tabular}{lllcccl} … … 145 147 \end{tabular} 146 148 147 In the first two cases the weather conditions at La Palma were bad. In the last two 148 a couple of GRBs were detected within two hours by SWIFT. They were observable since 149 their own onset and for all the following 5 hours. The weather was good, but unfortunately 150 the Telescope was off-service because of the exceptional events occured in La Palma 151 during the previous weeks. 149 It's a pitty that weather conditions at La Palma were bad. 152 150 153 151 \subsection{Experience from SWIFT GRBs until now} … … 166 164 \end{tabular} 167 165 166 In the first three alerts weather conditions in La Palma were bad. In the last two 167 a couple of GRBs were detected within two hours by SWIFT. They were observable since 168 their own onset and for all the following 5 hours. The weather was good, but unfortunately 169 the Telescope was off-service because of the exceptional events occured in La Palma 170 during the previous weeks. 171 168 172 \subsection{Comparison between the Satellite Orbits} 169 173 170 174 Figure~\ref{fig:orbit} shows the orbits of the \sw, \he and \ig satellites. 171 The\sw and \he satellites are situated in a circular orbit with175 \sw and \he satellites are situated in a circular orbit with 172 176 20.6$^\circ$ and 2$^\circ$ inclination, respectively. 173 One revolution of the \sw and \he satellites lastabout 100\,min.174 The\ig satellite has a highly eccentric orbit with a revolution period of three sidereal days around the Earth.177 One revolution of \sw and \he satellites lasts about 100\,min. 178 \ig satellite has a highly eccentric orbit with a revolution period of three sidereal days around the Earth. 175 179 176 180 \par 177 181 178 It is difficult to draw strong conclusions from the individual satellite s'orbits.179 The orientation of the satellites'FoV is influenced by the scheduled targets.182 It is difficult to draw strong conclusions from the individual satellite orbits. 183 The orientation of satellites FoV is influenced by the scheduled targets. 180 184 However, \sw is the satellite with the largest inclination and overlaps mostly with the FoV of \ma. 181 This increases the chance to receive {\bf Red Al arms} from this satellite.185 This increases the chance to receive {\bf Red Alerts} from this satellite. 182 186 183 187 \begin{figure}[htp] 184 188 \centering 185 189 \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{GCNsatellites.eps} 186 \caption{Orbits of the \sw (top), \he (center) and \ig (bottom) satellites: The pointedlines187 show the orbit while thedrawn lines show the horizon of the Sun. Here, a typical night at188 La Palma is shown. The \sw satellite passes over theRoque seven times each night.}190 \caption{Orbits of \sw (top), \he (center) and \ig (bottom) satellites: dot lines 191 show the orbit while drawn lines show the horizon of the Sun. Here, a typical night at 192 La Palma is shown. \sw satellite passes over Roque seven times each night.} 189 193 \label{fig:orbit} 190 194 \end{figure}
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.