- Timestamp:
- 02/20/05 20:22:06 (20 years ago)
- Location:
- trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor
- Files:
-
- 89 added
- 2 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Calibration.tex
r6640 r6643 947 947 948 948 \begin{equation} 949 \Delta T_{\mathrm{cosmics}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{4\,\mathrm{ns}^2}{<Q>/{\mathrm{phe}}} + \frac{20\,\mathrm{ns}^2}{<Q>^2/{\mathrm{phe^2}}} + 0.04\,\mathrm{ns}^2} . 949 \Delta T_{\mathrm{cosmics}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{4\,\mathrm{ns}^2}{<Q>/{\mathrm{phe}}} 950 + \frac{20\,\mathrm{ns}^2}{<Q>^2/{\mathrm{phe^2}}} + 0.04\,\mathrm{ns}^2} . 950 951 \label{eq:time:fitprediction} 951 952 \end{equation} -
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/MonteCarlo.tex
r6642 r6643 56 56 \subsection{Conversion Factors \label{sec:mc:convfactors}} 57 57 58 In the following figures~\ref{fig:mc:ChargeDivNphe_FixW} through~\ref{fig:mc:ChargeDivNphe_DFSpline} show the conversion factors58 The following figures~\ref{fig:mc:ChargeDivNphe_FixW} through~\ref{fig:mc:ChargeDivNphe_DFSpline} show the conversion factors 59 59 between reconstructed charge and the number of input photo-electrons for each of the tested extractors, with and without added noise 60 60 and for the high-gain and low-gain channels, respectively. One can see that the conversion factors depend on the extraction window size and … … 109 109 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 110 110 111 \subsection{Measurement of the Biases \label{sec:mc:baises}} 112 111 113 \begin{figure}[htp]%%[t!] 112 114 \centering
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.