Ignore:
Timestamp:
02/20/05 20:22:06 (21 years ago)
Author:
gaug
Message:
*** empty log message ***
Location:
trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor
Files:
89 added
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed

  • trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/Calibration.tex

    r6640 r6643  
    947947
    948948\begin{equation}
    949 \Delta T_{\mathrm{cosmics}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{4\,\mathrm{ns}^2}{<Q>/{\mathrm{phe}}} + \frac{20\,\mathrm{ns}^2}{<Q>^2/{\mathrm{phe^2}}} + 0.04\,\mathrm{ns}^2} .
     949\Delta T_{\mathrm{cosmics}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{4\,\mathrm{ns}^2}{<Q>/{\mathrm{phe}}}
     950+ \frac{20\,\mathrm{ns}^2}{<Q>^2/{\mathrm{phe^2}}} + 0.04\,\mathrm{ns}^2} .
    950951\label{eq:time:fitprediction}
    951952\end{equation}

  • trunk/MagicSoft/TDAS-Extractor/MonteCarlo.tex

    r6642 r6643  
    5656\subsection{Conversion Factors \label{sec:mc:convfactors}}
    5757
    58 In the following figures~\ref{fig:mc:ChargeDivNphe_FixW} through~\ref{fig:mc:ChargeDivNphe_DFSpline} show the conversion factors
     58The following figures~\ref{fig:mc:ChargeDivNphe_FixW} through~\ref{fig:mc:ChargeDivNphe_DFSpline} show the conversion factors
    5959between reconstructed charge and the number of input photo-electrons for each of the tested extractors, with and without added noise
    6060and for the high-gain and low-gain channels, respectively. One can see that the conversion factors depend on the extraction window size and
    … …  
    109109%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    110110
     111\subsection{Measurement of the Biases \label{sec:mc:baises}}
     112
    111113\begin{figure}[htp]%%[t!]
    112114\centering
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.