Changeset 6865 for trunk/MagicSoft
- Timestamp:
- 03/20/05 21:37:32 (20 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/MagicSoft/GC-Proposal/GC.tex
r6864 r6865 184 184 Hendrik Bartko & MPI Munich & hbartko@mppmu.mpg.de & data analysis, spectra, wobble mode 185 185 \\ Adrian Biland & ETH Zurich & biland@particle.phys.ethz.ch & MC generation, Moon observations 186 \\ Erica Bisesi & Univ. Udine & bisesi@fisica.uniud.it & dark matter halo modelling, clump ness186 \\ Erica Bisesi & Univ. Udine & bisesi@fisica.uniud.it & dark matter halo modelling, clumpyness 187 187 \\ Sebastian Commichau & ETH Zurich & commichau@particle.phys.ethz.ch & 188 188 data analysis, spectra, geomagnetic effects 189 189 \\ Pepe Flix & IFAE Barcelona& jflix@ifae.es & data analysis, disp, spectra, dark matter 190 190 \\ Sabrina Stark & ETH Zurich & lstark@particle.phys.ethz.ch & data analysis, spectra 191 \\ Wolfgang Wittek & MPI Munich & wittek@mppmu.mpg.de & padding, unfolding 191 \\ Wolfgang Wittek & MPI Munich & wittek@mppmu.mpg.de & padding, unfolding, disp 192 192 \\ 193 193 \hline … … 285 285 % All dark matter distributions that predict observable fluxes are cusped, yielding an approximately point-like source. 286 286 287 Using fits of these dark matter profiles to the rotation data of the Milky Way predictions for the density profile $\rho_{\chi}$ of the dark matter can be made \cite{Fornego2004,Evans2004}. On the other hand, for a given model of the dark matter particles $m_{\chi},\;\langle \sigma v \rangle$ and $N_{\gamma}$ are determined. Combining the particle physics predictions with the predictions for the DM density profile 288 predictions for the gamma flux from dark matter particle annihilation are derived. 287 Using fits of these dark matter profiles to the rotation data of the Milky Way predictions for the density profile $\rho_{\chi}$ of the dark matter can be made \cite{Fornego2004,Evans2004}. On the other hand, for a given model of the dark matter particles $m_{\chi},\;\langle \sigma v \rangle$ and $N_{\gamma}$ are determined. Combining the particle physics predictions with the predictions for the DM density profile, predictions for the gamma flux from dark matter particle annihilation are derived. 289 288 %Assuming parameters for the SUSY models determine the neutralino mass, the thermally averaged annihilation cross section and the gamma yield. Combining both models about the dark matter distribution and SUSY 290 289 291 Figure \ref{fig:exclusion_lmits} shows exclusion limits for MAGIC (solid straight lines) for the four most promising sources, 292 in the plane $\langle \sigma v \rangle$ vs. $m_{\chi}$. The energy threshold $E_{\mathrm{th}}$ has been assumed to be 100 GeV. Due to its proximity the GC yields the largest expected flux from particle dark matter annihilation and thus the lowest exclusion limit. Nevertheless, this minimum measurable flux is more than one order of magnitude above the highest fluxes predicted by SUSY models (full circles). Also the flux measured by the HESS experiment is far above the theoretical expectation (dotted line).%N_{\gamma}(E_{\gamma}>E_{\mathrm{th}}) 290 % (solid straight lines) (full circles) 291 Figure \ref{fig:exclusion_lmits} shows exclusion limits for MAGIC for the four most promising sources, 292 in the plane $\langle \sigma v \rangle$ vs. $m_{\chi}$. The energy threshold $E_{\mathrm{th}}$ has been assumed to be 100 GeV. Due to its proximity the GC yields the largest expected flux from particle dark matter annihilation and thus the lowest exclusion limit. Nevertheless, this minimum measurable flux is more than one order of magnitude above the highest fluxes predicted by SUSY models for the NFW halo profile. For this profile also the flux measured by the HESS experiment is far above the theoretical expectation. In the extreme case of adiabatic compression some models might be in reach of the observations. 293 294 295 % (dotted line).%N_{\gamma}(E_{\gamma}>E_{\mathrm{th}}) 293 296 294 297 … … 297 300 \includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{mSugra_Scan2.eps}% {plot_DM_exclusion_1.eps}%{Dark_exclusion_limits.eps} 298 301 \end{center} 299 \caption[DM exclusion limits.]{Exclusion limits (solid straight lines) for the four most promising sources of dark matter annihilation radiation. The GC is expected to give the largest flux (lowest exclusion limits) amongst all sources. For energies above 700 GeV, the flux from the GC as observed by the HESS experiment (dotted line) is within the reach of MAGIC. The full circles represent flux predictions from some typical SUSY models.} \label{fig:exclusion_lmits} 302 \caption[DM exclusion limits.]{Exclusion limits for the four most promising sources of dark matter annihilation radiation. The GC is expected to give the largest flux (lowest exclusion limits) amongst all sources. Only in the extreme case of adiabatic compression observable fluxes are predicted.}% For energies above 700 GeV, the flux from the GC as observed by the HESS experiment (dotted line) is within the reach of MAGIC. The full circles represent flux predictions from some typical SUSY models.} 303 \label{fig:exclusion_lmits} % (solid straight lines) 300 304 \end{figure} 301 305
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.